Tikker wrote:Naethyn wrote:Religion doesn't kill people. People kill people.
that's overly simplistic and very naive
If not religion, something else.
http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103800
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Tikker wrote:Naethyn wrote:Religion doesn't kill people. People kill people.
that's overly simplistic and very naive
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
Gypsiyee wrote:are you serious, or do you just form opinions based on your political agenda?
Gypsiyee wrote:did I say anything about non-catholics exclusively? no, I didn't - there are catholic homosexuals, and there are certainly no hate exceptions made for them.
Gypsiyee wrote:they teach hate for those who aren't of the same beliefs as you.
Gypsiyee wrote:they simply tell you that for the rest of eternity, if you don't agree and believe like they do, you are a heathen and may you burn in hell.
Gypsiyee wrote:you don't have to re-define hate, it's the same principle. "this is wrong, you should be condemned for eternity for this." I fail to see the difference
Gypsiyee wrote:, except that you think they're all terrorists so clearly they're worse.
Gypsiyee wrote:your disgust at their teachings is not because what they do is so drastically far from what other religions do, it's that their words present it differently and your perception has been spoon-fed and candy-coated since you were a child.. so was theirs, and they're likely equally appalled by your religion. you say hating sin is different from hating people - clearly, another religion is sin to them, so again.. how is it any different?
Gypsiyee wrote:they're not dogs. you're on one side of the fence
Gypsiyee wrote:and believe your side to be true and justified, just as they do. they have some extremists who take the word literally. we have some extremists who take the word of the bible literally too, and it results in the same thing: hate and death. it's all a matter of perception, and we are no better than the other
Gypsiyee wrote: - if you could see us through the eyes of any other country, you'd probably agree.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
brinstar wrote:okay now we're using south park to bolster our arguments about religious violence
no
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
Lueyen wrote:The difference is that one teaching addresses how a divine being will pass judgment, and what the results will be, the other puts the passing of judgment into the hands of fallible mankind.
Lueyen wrote:The difference is that one teaching addresses how a divine being will pass judgment, and what the results will be, the other puts the passing of judgment into the hands of fallible mankind.
Harrison wrote:Nope, you fit the definition quite nicely.
Tikker wrote:do you honestly believe that religion is NEVER the cause of the violence?
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
Naethyn wrote:Tikker wrote:do you honestly believe that religion is NEVER the cause of the violence?
I didn't say that. People use religion for violence justification all the time. My point is if religion didn't exist people would justify that same violence with something else. Religion is not the source.
Harrison wrote:Nope, you fit the definition quite nicely.
Evermore wrote:There is a bit of a difference between Christians and Catholics.
Tikker wrote:Evermore wrote:There is a bit of a difference between Christians and Catholics.
err, catholics are christians
yes obviously there's differences between the different sects of christianity
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests