Moderator: Dictators in Training
Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.
Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.
Narrock wrote:Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.
Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.
Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.
leah wrote:Narrock wrote:Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.
Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.
Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.
yep, pretty much the same reason he says ol barry instead of barack or obama.
Darcler wrote:Narrock wrote:Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.
Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.
yep, pretty much the same reason he says ol barry instead of barack or obama.
Yeah that one is pretty annoying too.
And no Mindia, that tells me nothing because I dont care. I have little to no clue what Al Gore has said about Global Warming or what other people have said about Al Gore saying something about Global Warming.
Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.
Narrock wrote: Hundreds of scientists also invalidated this claim with proof (scientific example after example), hence making algore looking like a fool with his dick in his hand. Global warming is cyclical. This is scientific fact.
Ginzburgh wrote: went #1?
Tikker wrote:Narrock wrote: Hundreds of scientists also invalidated this claim with proof (scientific example after example), hence making algore looking like a fool with his dick in his hand. Global warming is cyclical. This is scientific fact.
you don't get science on your side in one argument and religion in another
pick a side of the fence troll
you're missing the point again josh
fuckwit up there is trying to use science to discredit global warming in this thread, while in another thread he is ignoring science because he doesn't like the idea of evolution
tikker's point has nothing to do with exclusivity, it has to do with jumping the fence when the topic changes
not that there isn't already a vast backlog showing a tendency for waffling
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests