Moderator: Dictators in Training
Narrock wrote:Again, I have to point out that I've said a couple times already that Bush spent like a drunken sailor, and that kind of liberal fiscal spending is not congruent with how the republican party is supposed to act. I also mentioned that because of that kind of behavior is what prompted the conservative grass roots movement to rise... a group of republicans and conservative independents trying to get back to true conservatism... the Tea Party. I'm still baffled about what made Birnstar spit out his beverage...
. The mother fucking OWS movement is funded by billionnaires and a prominent globalist. What was your point exactly? Anyway, the tea party IS a grass roots movement.Tossica wrote:Narrock wrote:Again, I have to point out that I've said a couple times already that Bush spent like a drunken sailor, and that kind of liberal fiscal spending is not congruent with how the republican party is supposed to act. I also mentioned that because of that kind of behavior is what prompted the conservative grass roots movement to rise... a group of republicans and conservative independents trying to get back to true conservatism... the Tea Party. I'm still baffled about what made Birnstar spit out his beverage...
The Tea Party is funded by billionaires. Grass roots movements don't have billionaire support.
Narrock wrote:Doesn't matter, even if I agree with you on some points. Birnstar's basic theory is that Republican's are blood-thirsty war mongers, which is wrong and an ignorant stance, and I just wanted to point out the FACT that it was the DEMOCRATS who got us into most wars and who subsequently got America into a financial mess, no matter how you try to spin it. Anyway, my biggest problem with the democratic party is their retarded stance on social issues. Their fiscal retardation just adds fuel to the fire.
brinstar wrote:Narrock wrote:Doesn't matter, even if I agree with you on some points. Birnstar's basic theory is that Republican's are blood-thirsty war mongers, which is wrong and an ignorant stance, and I just wanted to point out the FACT that it was the DEMOCRATS who got us into most wars and who subsequently got America into a financial mess, no matter how you try to spin it. Anyway, my biggest problem with the democratic party is their retarded stance on social issues. Their fiscal retardation just adds fuel to the fire.
(post preemptively moved to EE to avoid tyranny)
Narrock wrote:brinstar wrote:Narrock wrote:Doesn't matter, even if I agree with you on some points. Birnstar's basic theory is that Republican's are blood-thirsty war mongers, which is wrong and an ignorant stance, and I just wanted to point out the FACT that it was the DEMOCRATS who got us into most wars and who subsequently got America into a financial mess, no matter how you try to spin it. Anyway, my biggest problem with the democratic party is their retarded stance on social issues. Their fiscal retardation just adds fuel to the fire.
(post preemptively moved to EE to avoid tyranny)
Why don't you just exercise some restraint and have some respect for the rules of the NT and make your point HERE in a civil manner?
Narrock wrote:Hey, remember when that guy (forgot his name) called Arlos a "Brown Shirt"? Arlos unleashed the fury on him like I've never seen.
Narrock wrote:. The mother fucking OWS movement is funded by billionnaires and a prominent globalist. What was your point exactly? Anyway, the tea party IS a grass roots movement.Tossica wrote:Narrock wrote:Again, I have to point out that I've said a couple times already that Bush spent like a drunken sailor, and that kind of liberal fiscal spending is not congruent with how the republican party is supposed to act. I also mentioned that because of that kind of behavior is what prompted the conservative grass roots movement to rise... a group of republicans and conservative independents trying to get back to true conservatism... the Tea Party. I'm still baffled about what made Birnstar spit out his beverage...
The Tea Party is funded by billionaires. Grass roots movements don't have billionaire support.
brinstar wrote:oh man, there are plenty of things to address in both those articles without even resorting to the bias argument
but i will have to postpone my response for now until i can really sit down and pick them over
. Read the articles.Tossica wrote:There's nothing to fund. There's no candidate to bankroll. Is he providing soup and blankets for the people camping out? Is he providing markers and materials for making signs? What exactly is he bankrolling?
Arlos wrote:I haven't read the articles yet, but how, exactly, is Soros bankrolling something any different in any way than the Koch brothers bankrolling the Tea Party?
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/Pet ... -anonymity
-Arlos
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests