namelesstavern.net

by **Langston** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:27 am

*wiggle*

touch my belly! you know you want to!!

by **The Kizzy** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:34 am

:shock:

I don't know what to say.

by **Langston** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:56 am

don't say anything...

words aren't necessary...

*wiggles his belly*

just touch the belly.

by **Dylan** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Just do it.

by **Bludvl** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:41 pm

vonkaar wrote:
Bludvl wrote:My opinion on gay relationships is one that if the relationship itself cannot possibly turn into one that could produce children...then it wasn't meant to be.

I'll go ring up my buddy who married a woman that had endometriosis at a young age, preventing her from baring children. I'll tell him that you don't think that his relationship was meant to be because it will never possibly turn into one that could produce children.

Later, I'll visit a support group for couples that are dealing with conception issues and tell them to divorce their spouses because the relationship was not meant to be.

Born without balls? Don't bother getting married.

Early onset of ovarian/testicular cancer? Get ready for a lonely life.

Farming accident? erm...

Lazy sperm? Incapable uterine lining? Tough break... good luck with bachelorhood.

Oh wait, those couples could adopt! They could raise their kids in a healthy home and those kids could grow up to be astronauts, doctors and generals. This happy home was made possible because the loving, infertile couple adopted.

Oh wait... Fags could do that too...

Okay...apparently I should have clarified what I meant by "possibly". When I say possible...it is in reference to that a man and a woman "CAN" conceive...meaning that men and women together are "capable" of producing children. While in a homosexual relationship it is "impossible" whether both person's reproductive organs work. Feel better now board champ?

by **Ouchyfish** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:48 pm

That, my friend, is what flamers refer to as the classic...

BACKPEDAL

have fun with your new tricycle!!!! Don't play in the street!

by **vonkaar** » Fri Jul 16, 2004 9:33 pm

Bludvl wrote:Okay...apparently I should have clarified what I meant by "possibly". When I say possible...it is in reference to that a man and a woman "CAN" conceive...meaning that men and women together are "capable" of producing children. While in a homosexual relationship it is "impossible" whether both person's reproductive organs work. Feel better now board champ?

No. In the case of Bob and Cheryl, they cannot POSSIBLY conceive children. Their only option is adoption.

Ernest and Jason cannot POSSIBLY conceive children. Their only option is adoption.

Is the creation of offspring the only reason to justify the legality of marriage? Or, is it a simple matter of what you feel to be natural? If your method of choosing who can and cannot marry is based on what you feel to be 'natural', Bob and Cheryl shouldn't marry because Bob wears glasses. That's unnatural. Oh, but you were specifically talking about the biological process of creating a child. The question of creating or adopting children is not relevant. Nobody here is claiming that gay men should be allowed the 'right' to get pregnant. We aren't even talking about the right to adopt.

The focus of this thread is MARRIAGE. Stick to the fucking point.

by **mappatazee** » Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:59 am

Oh boy, people shouldn't take medication. That would be unnatural.

by **Norglebuk** » Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:22 am

If it makes them happy, then so be it. Everyone deserves to be happy.

Even George Bush could pwn you with a reply to that.

I would see it acceptable for gays to be united. I, however, would strongly forbid them adopting children. Stop being so god-damm open minded, close your eyes, and think about the kids! Also, while your eyes are closed and you feel someone rail you from behind Vonks, remember, everyone deserves to be happy. Honestly though, gays are good law abiding citizens. Sure blood and jizz are the two best transmiiters of HIV and putting Wuan man + Waun man = two men with the probabilities of a racoon eating a rather large fetus and being able to digest it in under thirty-seconds, disguard the waste, then having a high probability of regurgitating it once done eating their own spue because we all know bundles of sticks enjoy doing that.

by **mappatazee** » Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:26 am

omg fag hater

by **Norglebuk** » Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:38 am

omg fag hater

omg a fag!

by **apolo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:13 am

i dont know if this subject is dead or if someone already said this but think about it this way: Gay's do immoral things, but they think nothing is wrong with it, right? Whats the difference between that and incest, polygamy, and what not? they are all doing immoral things and they dont think anything is wrong with it...should we start with gays and move on to incest after?

by **The Kizzy** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:17 am

Who is to say that it is immoral? You? Incest is AGAINST THE LAW where being gay is not.

by **Harrison** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:19 am

I get his point.

Illegal and Immoral to one, who are we to say they are.

etc.

by **Caladore Buhbong** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:33 am

If a couple of guys wanna get married and fuck. Let em do it.

If a couple of chicks wanna get married and fuck.
Let em do it. And Tape it.

by **apolo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:35 am

being gay isn't illegal... but gay Marriage is (in some states at least). which was the topic- sorry should have worded last post better. so re-read my post with gay marriage put in there np.!

by **Tacks** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:39 am

Who made you the moral police fagboy?

by **Caladore Buhbong** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:41 am

I think you might be confused. Gay marrage isnt illegal, its just not available. Its assfucking thats illegal. But thats for Straight and Gay people.

by **Tossica** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:51 am

The sheer amount of ignorance present in this thread is staggering.

Wow.

by **apolo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:51 am

i think i am confused...taxx thinks being gay is morally okay?

marry me!

anyways that was just my thought, so you guys can talk about it.....now

by **Caladore Buhbong** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:51 am

Yeah, but never the less. Assfucking is illegal in some states.

by **The Kizzy** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 1:09 pm

apolo wrote:i think i am confused...taxx thinks being gay is morally okay?

marry me!

anyways that was just my thought, so you guys can talk about it.....now

Sorry Taxx is taken, now back off before I find you and hurt you.

by **Tacks** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 1:58 pm

It doesn't matter what you OR I think, people can do whatever the fuck they want as long as it's not hurting me.

by **Harrison** » Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:49 am

Or unless some politicians suddenly feel they have a say in what the fuck we do behind closed doors.

by **Yager** » Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:40 pm

boybutter wrote:KIDS! the point of this post, for you thick headed religious folk, is that the US Government should NOT be making law based on the religious beliefs of others, forcing the entire country to abide the rules of your religion doesn't make them holy or want to follow you religion, it pisses them off that they are having the freedom to live their life as they wish impeded by YOUR DOGMA not by basic MORAL guidelines that treat people equally.

Saying that you think it is wrong because your bible says so should have little to do with what rights the US government has to impose the moral and ethical constraints of a particular religion on everyone in the country

But, I am sure all you folks hear is blah, blah, blah

well then i guess rape murder and all those other laws should be dropped since they are all based on religious beleifs then to huh?

namelesstavern.net

WTF - Gay Marriage

Do you support the ban on gay marriage?

ouch!!!!!!

Who is online