DON'T YOU DARE CLICK THIS THREAD

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:37 am

BUT IN THIS CASE THEY JOWNXED U THOROROROUGHLY ELOHELE

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:36 am

I would like to take this momentary break in posting to give a wholehearted fuck you to kat krew....

Drem · Post by **Drem** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:58 pm

LOL MMOKFJEKEKE

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:06 pm

Dude, shut up.

Drem · Post by **Drem** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:19 pm

OH GO CRY ETC

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:28 pm

Wtf, I will :cry:

Drem · Post by **Drem** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:31 pm

hairygayfaggotfuckthisisifdjkdlsjfklsd;
ex
ex
ex
ex
ex
ex
ex
ex
ex
exx
<3

Jeddas · Post by **Jeddas** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 5:29 am

Fag

1. A student at a British public school who is required to perform menial tasks for a student in a higher class.
2. A drudge.
2. Chiefly British. Fatiguing or tedious work; drudgery.

1. To work to exhaustion; toil.

To exhaust; weary: Four hours on the tennis court fagged me out.

n. Slang

A cigarette.

n. Offensive Slang

Used as a disparaging term for a homosexual man.

Drem · Post by **Drem** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 5:44 am

you forgot the word's root which is a bundle of sticks

Jeddas · Post by **Jeddas** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:01 am

1. A student at a British public school who is required to perform menial tasks for a student in a higher class.

was neat- was also another definition I ignored.

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 10:30 am

if i were a cat... johnn would be this dog-

Drem · Post by **Drem** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 2:17 pm

Adivina · Post by **Adivina** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 3:04 pm

NAME IS LIKE THIS DEEP FANTASY ALIAS. DARKFYRRRRRRRRRRRRRE

Drem why the hate for my last name!? I thought you had <3 for me!

PS. Brinstar I was mowing my lawn the other day and there were many bees, but they were not joyful. How do I fix them?

brinstar · Post by **brinstar** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 3:57 pm

give them candy! or maybe whiskey.

and ralf if i see a member of kat krew i will let them know that you are out trolling for them

love,

cat crew

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:08 pm

ralfmacchio wrote:if i were a cat... johnn would be this dog-

I would be licking your pussy?

Menelvir · Post by **Menelvir** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:17 pm

Wasps and other insects respond surprisingly well to goodies containing
phenothrin, tetramethrin, or diazinon.

Drem · Post by **Drem** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 5:19 pm

The simple intent of a recording is to try to store the artistic expression in such a way that the listener will have optimum clarity of the sound of that performance and therefore can perceive the artistry of it. This means drawing the most nearly perfect straight line (preserving the linearity) between the input from the artist and the information output available to the consumer. Intrinsically, a recording represent the end of a chain of storage media — tape, lacquer master, metal parts and, finally, vinyl or back to tape.

But watch that first step! All subsequent forms can do nothing to improve our precious linearity, and every wiggle in that straight line introduced in that first step is inevitably present in the final product.

Recording devices have historically described their credentials in technical terms of "frequency response," "signal-to-noise ratio," "distortion characteristics," "cross talk" (in multi-track recording), "wow and flutter," "print through"— to the technically oriented, a series of numbers that reflected, comparatively, a device's ability to trace some kind of line between its input and output. And between the days of acoustic recording and today's tape machines, there is in evidence a vast improvement in the character of that line. But suddenly, thanks not only to the computer age of hardware but also to the discipline of digital thinking, a new system of recording reared its elegant head, nodding in the direction of audio recording and making it possible for the consumer to have an infinitely clearer concept of the original sonic experience. It is called "digital" because it records numbers to represent the sound. The value of the system is that these numbers are not subject to the frailties of conventional tape recording, and therefore it can produce a virtual straight line between studio and disc.

Conventional recording devices from the time of Edison's cylinder have always attempted to describe and store sound in a form analogous to the manner in which we perceive it, that is, a mechanical, electrical or magnetic fluctuation that follows the air pressure variations by which we experience a sound—a logical idea, provided all associated devices can do that with adequate fidelity. As matters stand today, microphones respond to these sound-pressure variations and convert them into an accurate electrical analog. In that form nothing much can go wrong in today's mixing consoles, but storing the signal of mechanical or magnetic form introduces elements of confusion primarily because of the storage medium itself. And confusion is a lack of clarity in conveying the aesthetic message. There goes the desirable linearity!

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 5:29 pm

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:41 pm

Johnn of War wrote:
ralfmacchio wrote:if i were a cat... johnn would be this dog-

I would be licking your pussy?

if by your definition of "pussy" you mean 12 inches of throbbin death with a side of nuts and choad, than yes.

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:42 pm

Johnn of War wrote:
ralfmacchio wrote:if i were a cat... johnn would be this dog-

I would be licking your pussy?

if by your definition of "pussy" you mean 12 inches of throbbin death with a side of nuts and choad, than yes.

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:43 pm

OH DAMN... my comment was so great the gods saw fit to make it a double post.

:eyecrazy:

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:44 pm

Owned by the internet.

Adivina · Post by **Adivina** » Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm

if by your definition of "pussy" you mean 12 inches of throbbin death with a side of nuts and choad, than yes.

Wrong side of the ruler no? :boots:

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:30 am

yes it was the wrong side... but I was measuring width.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:55 am

The more bark, the lesser the bite...