Page 6 of 8
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:20 am
by Eziekial
Who determines need in a communist government? Because I need a vacation to Vegas with about 50k in my pocket to burn at the crap tables and pick up loose women

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:29 am
by Tikker
Eziekial wrote:Who determines need in a communist government? Because I need a vacation to Vegas with about 50k in my pocket to burn at the crap tables and pick up loose women

that's why communism generally doesn't work
If everyone has exactly the same ideals, and goals, it would work np
but once you have dissenting opinions, you have to have a way to settle disputes, and choose the best solution
the problem is that pretty much 100% of the time so far, someone grabs power via the barrel of a gun, and keeps it, and you end up with a dictatorship, not a communist society
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:49 am
by Lyion
Thus, communism ends up being evil.
Granted thats circular logic, but it seems to always be the same circle.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:06 pm
by Gidan
lyion wrote:Thus, communism ends up being evil.
Granted thats circular logic, but it seems to always be the same circle.
History and logic rarely go hand and hand. I would say the the behvior of people rarely follows a logical path.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:10 pm
by Lyion
The result of Marxist based regimes is always the same. It's like bringing up Bush and Diekan in a thread. There is only one result.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:44 pm
by xaoshaen
lyion wrote:Thus, communism ends up being evil.
Granted thats circular logic, but it seems to always be the same circle.
Except that it's not communism that ends up being evil, it's a dictatorship that may or may not be evil.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:47 pm
by Ganzo
lyion wrote:Thus, communism ends up being evil.
Granted thats circular logic, but it seems to always be the same circle.
All you doing is saying Humans are Evil by this line of logic
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:26 pm
by Lyion
Maybe, Ganzo. Power corrupts. Absolute power likewise.
Thus, the best form of Government we currently have is one with checks and balances to limit it.
It's not perfect, but realistically its as good as it gets right now.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:33 pm
by Tikker
lyion wrote:Maybe, Ganzo. Power corrupts. Absolute power likewise.
Thus, the best form of Government we currently have is one with checks and balances to limit it.
It's not perfect, but realistically its as good as it gets right now.
the problem I have with the current system (in canada/usa) is that lots of times it ends up a popularity contest, rather than voting for the person best suited for the job
that being said, I have no idea how to correct the situation
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:38 pm
by Gidan
lyion wrote:Maybe, Ganzo. Power corrupts. Absolute power likewise.
Thus, the best form of Government we currently have is one with checks and balances to limit it.
It's not perfect, but realistically its as good as it gets right now.
So it really comes down to people are evil not communism itself.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:19 pm
by Eziekial
People are also good. It's a balanced thing you know.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:19 pm
by Tikker
Ganzo wrote:lyion wrote:Thus, communism ends up being evil.
Granted thats circular logic, but it seems to always be the same circle.
All you doing is saying Humans are Evil by this line of logic
I think some people are evil
apparently americans in general do as well, that was your reasoning for invading Iraq, no?
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:29 pm
by xaoshaen
lyion wrote:Maybe, Ganzo. Power corrupts. Absolute power likewise.
Thus, the best form of Government we currently have is one with checks and balances to limit it.
It's not perfect, but realistically its as good as it gets right now.
Like they say, our system is the worst one available except for all the others. The real genious of the U.S. Constitution is that it fundamentally assumes that humans are avaricious, power hungry bastards. Exploiting this assumption and ensuring that human greed works to benefit the system was perhaps the most significant achievement of the framers.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:30 pm
by Lyion
Nah, we needed to up military spending, project imperialism, and piss off the French. The Iraq War accomplished all three so was a resounding success.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:37 pm
by xaoshaen
lyion wrote:Nah, we needed to up military spending, project imperialism, and piss off the French. The Iraq War accomplished all three so was a resounding success.
We dun it fer tha oil!
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:41 pm
by Arlos
Every time I think about the war in Iraq, I can't help but remember the Dead Kennedys song, "Kinky Sex Makes the World Go Round". If you don't know it, go listen to it, and you'll understand what I'm talking about.
-Arlos
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:44 pm
by Tossica
lyion wrote:Nah, we needed to up military spending, project imperialism, and piss off the French. The Iraq War accomplished all three so was a resounding success.
You say this in jest but it's pretty much spot on.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:48 pm
by Zanchief
You spend 400 billion on your military, you're gonna find a reason to use it.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:01 pm
by xaoshaen
Tossica wrote:lyion wrote:Nah, we needed to up military spending, project imperialism, and piss off the French. The Iraq War accomplished all three so was a resounding success.
You say this in jest but it's pretty much spot on.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:08 pm
by Harrison
As I told you, it would be absolutely, totally, and in all other ways inconceivable.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:11 pm
by Tossica
xaoshaen wrote:Tossica wrote:lyion wrote:Nah, we needed to up military spending, project imperialism, and piss off the French. The Iraq War accomplished all three so was a resounding success.
You say this in jest but it's pretty much spot on.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Uh... what word? You? Say? This? In? Jest? But? It's? Pretty? Much? Spot? On?
Which? I'm pretty sure I know what each of those words means.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:12 pm
by xaoshaen
Tossica wrote:xaoshaen wrote:Tossica wrote:lyion wrote:Nah, we needed to up military spending, project imperialism, and piss off the French. The Iraq War accomplished all three so was a resounding success.
You say this in jest but it's pretty much spot on.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Uh... what word? You? Say? This? In? Jest? But? It's? Pretty? Much? Spot? On?
Which? I'm pretty sure I know what each of those words means.
From the context, not so much.
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:12 pm
by Harrison
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:14 pm
by Yamori
Arlos wrote:Every time I think about the war in Iraq, I can't help but remember the Dead Kennedys song, "Kinky Sex Makes the World Go Round". If you don't know it, go listen to it, and you'll understand what I'm talking about.
-Arlos
I like the noises the brittish prime minister makes throughout the whole thing. Funny stuff.
Dead Kennedys was really cool --- its too bad Jello Biafra was a political idiot. I can't believe I fell for that crap, lol. But hey, it helped make me much more of a free thinker, so I can't complain. *tips hat to jello*
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:17 pm
by Zanchief
Would you like a peanut?