WTF - Gay Marriage

Let's throw things at them!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Post Reply

Do you support the ban on gay marriage?

HELL YES!
16
23%
HELL NO!
53
77%
 
Total votes: 69

User avatar
Langston
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
Posts: 7491
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:07 pm

Post by Langston »

*wiggle*

touch my belly! you know you want to!!
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
User avatar
The Kizzy
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 15193
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: In the closet with the ghosts

Post by The Kizzy »

:shock:

I don't know what to say.
Zanchief wrote:
Harrison wrote:I'm not dead


Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
User avatar
Langston
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
Posts: 7491
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:07 pm

Post by Langston »

don't say anything...

words aren't necessary...

*wiggles his belly*

just touch the belly.
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
User avatar
Dylan
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 5229
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:11 am
Location: Seattle

Post by Dylan »

Image

Just do it.
User avatar
Bludvl
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:31 pm

Post by Bludvl »

vonkaar wrote:
Bludvl wrote:My opinion on gay relationships is one that if the relationship itself cannot possibly turn into one that could produce children...then it wasn't meant to be.



I'll go ring up my buddy who married a woman that had endometriosis at a young age, preventing her from baring children. I'll tell him that you don't think that his relationship was meant to be because it will never possibly turn into one that could produce children.

Later, I'll visit a support group for couples that are dealing with conception issues and tell them to divorce their spouses because the relationship was not meant to be.

Born without balls? Don't bother getting married.

Early onset of ovarian/testicular cancer? Get ready for a lonely life.

Farming accident? erm...

Lazy sperm? Incapable uterine lining? Tough break... good luck with bachelorhood.

Oh wait, those couples could adopt! They could raise their kids in a healthy home and those kids could grow up to be astronauts, doctors and generals. This happy home was made possible because the loving, infertile couple adopted.

Oh wait... Fags could do that too...


Okay...apparently I should have clarified what I meant by "possibly". When I say possible...it is in reference to that a man and a woman "CAN" conceive...meaning that men and women together are "capable" of producing children. While in a homosexual relationship it is "impossible" whether both person's reproductive organs work. Feel better now board champ?
User avatar
Ouchyfish
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 4744
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

ouch!!!!!!

Post by Ouchyfish »

That, my friend, is what flamers refer to as the classic...


BACKPEDAL

have fun with your new tricycle!!!! Don't play in the street!
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
User avatar
vonkaar
Sexy Ass
Sexy Ass
Posts: 2054
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 9:03 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by vonkaar »

Bludvl wrote:Okay...apparently I should have clarified what I meant by "possibly". When I say possible...it is in reference to that a man and a woman "CAN" conceive...meaning that men and women together are "capable" of producing children. While in a homosexual relationship it is "impossible" whether both person's reproductive organs work. Feel better now board champ?


No. In the case of Bob and Cheryl, they cannot POSSIBLY conceive children. Their only option is adoption.

Ernest and Jason cannot POSSIBLY conceive children. Their only option is adoption.

Is the creation of offspring the only reason to justify the legality of marriage? Or, is it a simple matter of what you feel to be natural? If your method of choosing who can and cannot marry is based on what you feel to be 'natural', Bob and Cheryl shouldn't marry because Bob wears glasses. That's unnatural. Oh, but you were specifically talking about the biological process of creating a child. The question of creating or adopting children is not relevant. Nobody here is claiming that gay men should be allowed the 'right' to get pregnant. We aren't even talking about the right to adopt.

The focus of this thread is MARRIAGE. Stick to the fucking point.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
mappatazee
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 2122
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:54 am
Location: au Eugene
Contact:

Post by mappatazee »

Oh boy, people shouldn't take medication. That would be unnatural.
Norglebuk
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:37 am

Post by Norglebuk »

If it makes them happy, then so be it. Everyone deserves to be happy.

Even George Bush could pwn you with a reply to that.

I would see it acceptable for gays to be united. I, however, would strongly forbid them adopting children. Stop being so god-damm open minded, close your eyes, and think about the kids! Also, while your eyes are closed and you feel someone rail you from behind Vonks, remember, everyone deserves to be happy. Honestly though, gays are good law abiding citizens. Sure blood and jizz are the two best transmiiters of HIV and putting Wuan man + Waun man = two men with the probabilities of a racoon eating a rather large fetus and being able to digest it in under thirty-seconds, disguard the waste, then having a high probability of regurgitating it once done eating their own spue because we all know bundles of sticks enjoy doing that.
mappatazee
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 2122
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:54 am
Location: au Eugene
Contact:

Post by mappatazee »

omg fag hater
Norglebuk
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:37 am

Post by Norglebuk »

omg fag hater


omg a fag!
apolo
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 11:46 pm

Post by apolo »

i dont know if this subject is dead or if someone already said this but think about it this way: Gay's do immoral things, but they think nothing is wrong with it, right? Whats the difference between that and incest, polygamy, and what not? they are all doing immoral things and they dont think anything is wrong with it...should we start with gays and move on to incest after?
User avatar
The Kizzy
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 15193
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: In the closet with the ghosts

Post by The Kizzy »

Who is to say that it is immoral? You? Incest is AGAINST THE LAW where being gay is not.
Zanchief wrote:
Harrison wrote:I'm not dead


Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

I get his point.

Illegal and Immoral to one, who are we to say they are.

etc.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
Caladore Buhbong
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:26 pm

Post by Caladore Buhbong »

If a couple of guys wanna get married and fuck. Let em do it.

If a couple of chicks wanna get married and fuck.
Let em do it. And Tape it.
<Center>
Image</Center>
apolo
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 11:46 pm

Post by apolo »

being gay isn't illegal... but gay Marriage is (in some states at least). which was the topic- sorry should have worded last post better. so re-read my post with gay marriage put in there np.!
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

Who made you the moral police fagboy?
Caladore Buhbong
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:26 pm

Post by Caladore Buhbong »

I think you might be confused. Gay marrage isnt illegal, its just not available. Its assfucking thats illegal. But thats for Straight and Gay people.
<Center>
Image</Center>
Tossica
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 12490
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:21 pm

Post by Tossica »

The sheer amount of ignorance present in this thread is staggering.

Wow.
apolo
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 11:46 pm

Post by apolo »

i think i am confused...taxx thinks being gay is morally okay?

marry me!

anyways that was just my thought, so you guys can talk about it.....now
Caladore Buhbong
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:26 pm

Post by Caladore Buhbong »

Yeah, but never the less. Assfucking is illegal in some states.
<Center>
Image</Center>
User avatar
The Kizzy
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 15193
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: In the closet with the ghosts

Post by The Kizzy »

apolo wrote:i think i am confused...taxx thinks being gay is morally okay?

marry me!

anyways that was just my thought, so you guys can talk about it.....now


Sorry Taxx is taken, now back off before I find you and hurt you.
Zanchief wrote:
Harrison wrote:I'm not dead


Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

It doesn't matter what you OR I think, people can do whatever the fuck they want as long as it's not hurting me.
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

Or unless some politicians suddenly feel they have a say in what the fuck we do behind closed doors.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
Yager
NT Bixie
NT Bixie
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 11:00 pm

Post by Yager »

boybutter wrote:KIDS! the point of this post, for you thick headed religious folk, is that the US Government should NOT be making law based on the religious beliefs of others, forcing the entire country to abide the rules of your religion doesn't make them holy or want to follow you religion, it pisses them off that they are having the freedom to live their life as they wish impeded by YOUR DOGMA not by basic MORAL guidelines that treat people equally.

Saying that you think it is wrong because your bible says so should have little to do with what rights the US government has to impose the moral and ethical constraints of a particular religion on everyone in the country

But, I am sure all you folks hear is blah, blah, blah



well then i guess rape murder and all those other laws should be dropped since they are all based on religious beleifs then to huh?
Post Reply