Jirig wrote:Nick and Finley excel in one thing the Spurs are notoriously horrible with:
Clutch.
With the exception of Big Shot Bob, we haven't really had anyone to turn to to give us that quick fix of adrenaline we need to get back into the game when shit hits the fan.
This comprised, IMO, the deadly ferocity of the Mavs three/four years ago. When you have Finley, Van Exel, and Nash going on a streak in the fourth... you might as well stick a fork in yourself. Didn't matter if they were down by 2 or 20.
So, in conclusion, I think I will go out on a limb and say we've bagged the '06 championship. ;x
Heh, the single biggest factor in winning a championship? Injuries. If the Spurs lose Duncan in the playoffs, they're done, so you can't claim that they've 'bagged' another championship. These two signings essentially offer depth, insurance against injuries. If all the Spurs starters do stay healthy, the team will remain at roughly the same level of effectiveness as last season.
People love to talk about how 'clutch' Finley and Van Exel are, but they forget the corresponding cold streaks, particularly from Van Exel. They also overlook their woeful defensive deficiencies. Van Exel would have a hard time guarding a mannequin at this point in his career, and neither player is actually a significant upgrade over the incumbents whose minutes they'll be sharing.
As far as 'clutch' goes, Duncan put the entire team on his back and pulled them to victory multiple times in the playoffs last year, despite playing on two bad ankles. Anyone who thinks either Van Exel or Finley is going to be more important than Duncan in crunch time is crazy.