Where does it end, Part 451
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Where does it end, Part 451
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007 ... 02027.html
IBM has begun massive layoffs in a quiet manner, starting with 1300 employees, but by the end of the year, the total will rise to at least 100,000 and probably closer to 150,000 employees, nearly 40% of their U.S. workforce. Some people will be temporarily retained as contractors at a fraction of their salary, and eventually, IBM will also dump many of the unprofitable customer contracts worked on by Global Services or outsource the work to Asia.
IBM has begun massive layoffs in a quiet manner, starting with 1300 employees, but by the end of the year, the total will rise to at least 100,000 and probably closer to 150,000 employees, nearly 40% of their U.S. workforce. Some people will be temporarily retained as contractors at a fraction of their salary, and eventually, IBM will also dump many of the unprofitable customer contracts worked on by Global Services or outsource the work to Asia.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
– C. S. Lewis
– C. S. Lewis
-
araby
- Nappy Headed Ho

- Posts: 7818
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:53 am
- Location: Charleston, South Carolina
- Contact:
It's pure evil. Will these people lose their pensions too??
I know it's hardly relevant or even close to the kind of damage this does to fellow Americans-but the ticket companies online are just as evil. They buy all of the tickets as soon as they go on sale, forcing everyone to pay double what they would have paid if it were general admission. I think it should be illegal-how can they control that?
How can you tell a person-such as the CEO of IBM what to do with their company?? I don't know when it will end.
I know it's hardly relevant or even close to the kind of damage this does to fellow Americans-but the ticket companies online are just as evil. They buy all of the tickets as soon as they go on sale, forcing everyone to pay double what they would have paid if it were general admission. I think it should be illegal-how can they control that?
How can you tell a person-such as the CEO of IBM what to do with their company?? I don't know when it will end.

How can you stop people for looking to buy the cheapest computers they can find even if they are made in china? Hard to argue with Dell's business model, they just give the consumers what they want.
People have tried to market "Made in America" products and they've had a medicum of success. It's very hard to sell at a premium price without a vastly superior product.
People have tried to market "Made in America" products and they've had a medicum of success. It's very hard to sell at a premium price without a vastly superior product.
Is it the fault of these companies that it costs about 5x more to hire and pay American workers than it does for Chinese or Indians?
We should be yelling at the politicians that have made this situation what it is by messing so much with the economy.. With nearly 50% taxes on wages (huge cost of living and minimum wage needs bump), minions of accountants needed for taxes (increased number of employees needed for US companies), workers posing a perpetual risk for legal liability via harrassment and wrongful termination suits, and government induced inflation (paper money with no backing being printed at an ever increasing rate, artificially raised cost of living due to forced wage-fixing collusion with unions, ect..) - is it really the fault of these big companies to be moving their business somewhere cheaper? :/
Doesn't it strike anyone else as odd that (what, $2 an hour?) is a living wage for people in other countries?
We should be yelling at the politicians that have made this situation what it is by messing so much with the economy.. With nearly 50% taxes on wages (huge cost of living and minimum wage needs bump), minions of accountants needed for taxes (increased number of employees needed for US companies), workers posing a perpetual risk for legal liability via harrassment and wrongful termination suits, and government induced inflation (paper money with no backing being printed at an ever increasing rate, artificially raised cost of living due to forced wage-fixing collusion with unions, ect..) - is it really the fault of these big companies to be moving their business somewhere cheaper? :/
Doesn't it strike anyone else as odd that (what, $2 an hour?) is a living wage for people in other countries?
-Yamori
AKA ~~Baron Boshie of the Nameless~~
AKA ~~Baron Boshie of the Nameless~~
Eziekial wrote:exactly and you end up having to buy a compac computer that runs slow and costs $8k and your hanes t-shirts at walmart are $40 a piece.
great idea
This would spur a need to produce those products at home, causing a growth in our manufacturing. The situation can not continue if by enlarge companies are allowed to outsource the creation of goods and services and they are consumed here. In short we can not only be consumers, we must produce something. As more jobs go overseas, American purchasing power will decrease and if those overseas jobs market to Americans they will suddenly find themselves with less sales. In the end we will reach a point of equilibrium with the world in that the standard of living will be lowered for us and raised for other countries as the market "balances" it's self out. Our middle class won't disappear, but it's standard of living will mirror that of other countries (as it will be in the future not necessarily now), although it will most likely be not as good for us but better for others.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Eziekial wrote:Lueyan, that's horseshit and you know it. I'm heading out to watch the La Hoya fight but tomorrow if I'm bored, I'll break out the whopping stick and go to town.
Well unfortunately I won't likely be back on the board until next weekend, but feel free I'll catch up when I get back. I am interested as to why you think what I said is horse shit.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
I just dont know what to say anymore. Over the past year ive followed alot of stuff in business and politics. I read about it for hours everyday. All that it brings to me is depression. I cant help but feel that the entire country is selling itself to the rest of the world for the sake of a little more profit for its shareholders. People are getting "TOO GREEDY" profits are higher than ever, the stock market is reaching newer highs every day. For anyone to just shrug this off is just immoral.
Ive seriously been considering leaving the country and moving to Australia.
When you delve deep enough into everything you begin to realize that the citizens of the united states no longer have any form of control over what happens in this country.
The bottom line is America is gone, it is now a continent of corporations, and the people that work for them.
Ive seriously been considering leaving the country and moving to Australia.
When you delve deep enough into everything you begin to realize that the citizens of the united states no longer have any form of control over what happens in this country.
The bottom line is America is gone, it is now a continent of corporations, and the people that work for them.
ohhhhhh rusteh.
I'm sorry I called your post horseshit, it's just a different opinion than my own and you have your right to it. I recommend reading "The Law" by Bastiat as it is what I've based my opinion on. Listen to the candlemakers petition which I linked here for your listening pleasure as it's directed at protectionism that you have proposed.
http://www.freeaudio.org/fbastiat/Basti ... tition.mp3
http://bastiat.org/en/petition.html is the text version if you can't stand the narrators voice
It's a little heavy and if anyone wants cliffnotes, please let me know.
http://www.freeaudio.org/fbastiat/Basti ... tition.mp3
http://bastiat.org/en/petition.html is the text version if you can't stand the narrators voice
It's a little heavy and if anyone wants cliffnotes, please let me know.
Yamori, you wrongly blame the government for the cost of living here and the fact we like being a first world nation. I'm sorry, but personally I'm glad we don't live in a second or third world nation with a vast majority of our people living below the poverty line in Medieval style dwellings.
The problem is also not 'The Corporation'. Most of them play by the book and do what they are supposed to do, compete and fight for dollars.
The problem is the lack of vision in relation to the 'World Economy' by our government and their sole 'big vision' mentality.
A certain amount of free trade is good, but this needs to be tempered based on our quality of life with regulations that help equate the playing field with the communist and dictator nations whom can leverage their lack of human rights, lack of health care needs (since, who cares if a subject dies in china or other non free nations.. Certainly not the leaders) and disparate society rules.
Corporations will do what they can to maximize profits. That's fine. However, we need to have laws in place to ensure that the first focus of our government is the ability to protect and move forward our way of life, with an eye at protecting us so we are not forced to degrade this way of life due to 'global competition' and a lack of regulations in regards to goods and services with the only goal being the corporate bottom line.
Competition is good and is the engine of capitalism. However, open competition does not mean allowing free trade to countries whom do not have freedom. Likewise, competition does not mean the right to leverage foreign workers to displace ours for the bottom line. The main reason this is done is based on open competition and the need to cut labor costs, since other corporations are outsourcing.
If we have actual fair regulations in place disallowing all these H1Bs, massive service outsourcing, and other anti US worker trade practices in place then the companies will still be profitable, but won't be able to massively move jobs to other nations which not only tremendously hurts our middle class, but also allows a brain drain of creativity. They will still be successfull because the other companies will be required to do the same thing and in the long run it'll keep our creativity here, and allow us to trade with other countries whom are free and with a similar quality of life.
The problem is also not 'The Corporation'. Most of them play by the book and do what they are supposed to do, compete and fight for dollars.
The problem is the lack of vision in relation to the 'World Economy' by our government and their sole 'big vision' mentality.
A certain amount of free trade is good, but this needs to be tempered based on our quality of life with regulations that help equate the playing field with the communist and dictator nations whom can leverage their lack of human rights, lack of health care needs (since, who cares if a subject dies in china or other non free nations.. Certainly not the leaders) and disparate society rules.
Corporations will do what they can to maximize profits. That's fine. However, we need to have laws in place to ensure that the first focus of our government is the ability to protect and move forward our way of life, with an eye at protecting us so we are not forced to degrade this way of life due to 'global competition' and a lack of regulations in regards to goods and services with the only goal being the corporate bottom line.
Competition is good and is the engine of capitalism. However, open competition does not mean allowing free trade to countries whom do not have freedom. Likewise, competition does not mean the right to leverage foreign workers to displace ours for the bottom line. The main reason this is done is based on open competition and the need to cut labor costs, since other corporations are outsourcing.
If we have actual fair regulations in place disallowing all these H1Bs, massive service outsourcing, and other anti US worker trade practices in place then the companies will still be profitable, but won't be able to massively move jobs to other nations which not only tremendously hurts our middle class, but also allows a brain drain of creativity. They will still be successfull because the other companies will be required to do the same thing and in the long run it'll keep our creativity here, and allow us to trade with other countries whom are free and with a similar quality of life.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
– C. S. Lewis
– C. S. Lewis
Labor costs are not the be-all end-all of corporate bottom lines. If you look at just wages, most business owners will tell you that they are well below market value here in America (at least all the ones I talked to when running for office which was considerable) but when you factor in the "soft" costs such as liability insurance, payroll taxes, and regulations; it adds up. I've meet a lot of very smart people, much smarter than me try to dance around this issue of wages, offshoring, and protectionism and by far the most sage advice I ever heard was from an old "coon ass" small business owner who's grand dad was a famous cajun musician. We'd been discussing this topic for a while and he said:
"If a business doesn't make money, it doesn't make sense (cents)"
There you have it. I've yet to find a simple sentence that sums everything up like that does.
"If a business doesn't make money, it doesn't make sense (cents)"
There you have it. I've yet to find a simple sentence that sums everything up like that does.
-
mappatazee
- NT Traveller

- Posts: 2122
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:54 am
- Location: au Eugene
- Contact:
What's your point? That they can find other jobs? Of course they could. Why should they have to? Because your pissed off that pro-athletes make a lot of money?
My point is that without these pro-athletes there wouldn't be these jobs available (those in the industry and related industries). They help to create jobs. Why shouldn't they be rewarded for that?
My point is that without these pro-athletes there wouldn't be these jobs available (those in the industry and related industries). They help to create jobs. Why shouldn't they be rewarded for that?
We've had this discussion before but what is going on here is perfectly normal and in line with your statements, a bit of me being devil's advocate.
They are making our way of life better, just you aren't part if it, just like the poor and low-middle class. Your sacrifice allows my "way of life", and this IS the American way. No laws are needed to protect you, as it is 100% in your power to join the "upper" ranks.
This isn't anything about freedom or other countries being "fair", this is about money, and how much a company or person can make. You make it sound like you're looking for equality amongst some percentage of Americans, this is against the American dream, these folks just want a piece of pie and who cares if it is your piece, you aren't doing enough to earn it so I'm taking it.
There is no proof to this. If a company can make more profits by outsourceing 100% then there shouldn't be a problem.
It seems like folks are getting uncomfortable with the times just because there is a potential threat or lack of security in your job and/or way of life. Suck it up and deal with it, the poor have been doing it for years.
This country isn't about the middle class, it is about the upper class and if you aren't part of it then you aren't trying hard enough. You are what you sew, don't complain when you have the means to correct it, work harder, do more, etc. This is exactly what a good lot of you would be telling the poor inner city kids, but now that it effects the "middle-class" we've got this sky falling attitude.
/d-advocate off.
lyion wrote:Corporations will do what they can to maximize profits. That's fine. However, we need to have laws in place to ensure that the first focus of our government is the ability to protect and move forward our way of life, with an eye at protecting us so we are not forced to degrade this way of life due to 'global competition' and a lack of regulations in regards to goods and services with the only goal being the corporate bottom line.
They are making our way of life better, just you aren't part if it, just like the poor and low-middle class. Your sacrifice allows my "way of life", and this IS the American way. No laws are needed to protect you, as it is 100% in your power to join the "upper" ranks.
lyion wrote:Competition is good and is the engine of capitalism. However, open competition does not mean allowing free trade to countries whom do not have freedom. Likewise, competition does not mean the right to leverage foreign workers to displace ours for the bottom line. The main reason this is done is based on open competition and the need to cut labor costs, since other corporations are outsourcing.
This isn't anything about freedom or other countries being "fair", this is about money, and how much a company or person can make. You make it sound like you're looking for equality amongst some percentage of Americans, this is against the American dream, these folks just want a piece of pie and who cares if it is your piece, you aren't doing enough to earn it so I'm taking it.
lyion wrote:If we have actual fair regulations in place disallowing all these H1Bs, massive service outsourcing, and other anti US worker trade practices in place then the companies will still be profitable, but won't be able to massively move jobs to other nations which not only tremendously hurts our middle class, but also allows a brain drain of creativity. They will still be successfull because the other companies will be required to do the same thing and in the long run it'll keep our creativity here, and allow us to trade with other countries whom are free and with a similar quality of life.
There is no proof to this. If a company can make more profits by outsourceing 100% then there shouldn't be a problem.
It seems like folks are getting uncomfortable with the times just because there is a potential threat or lack of security in your job and/or way of life. Suck it up and deal with it, the poor have been doing it for years.
This country isn't about the middle class, it is about the upper class and if you aren't part of it then you aren't trying hard enough. You are what you sew, don't complain when you have the means to correct it, work harder, do more, etc. This is exactly what a good lot of you would be telling the poor inner city kids, but now that it effects the "middle-class" we've got this sky falling attitude.
/d-advocate off.






