Page 1 of 3

WEEK ONE -- how'd your team do?

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:17 pm
by Tadpole
My Dolphins CRUSHED the Broncos! Very surprised that we got over 400 yards of offense.

Gus Frerrote lit it the fuck up; 24/36, 275 yards passing, 2 TD, and 1 INT.

Surprising fact of the game: our ''horrible'' offensive line let up no sacks and protected Gus pretty well, although the run blocking didn't open many holes.

We had two goalline stands, almost had three but on fourth and goal Plummer found his FB for a 2 yard TD pass.

Jason Taylor's 85 yard fumble return was just the icing on the cake, boy that was thrilling!

DOLPHINS 34 BRONCOS 10

Game recap http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=250911015

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:39 pm
by Phlegm
Steelers won

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:15 pm
by mofish
Image

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:32 pm
by Tadpole
haha, that is a good pic :lol:

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:40 pm
by Baile
Tad's Dolphins beat the hell outta my Broncos. Plummer needs to be shot.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:24 pm
by Phlegm
Dolphins defense looks really good. Either that or the broncos offense sucks really bad.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:23 pm
by Gidan
My Pats won, I am happy.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:29 pm
by Tadpole
Baile wrote:Tad's Dolphins beat the hell outta my Broncos. Plummer needs to be shot.


Or your defense.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:12 pm
by Susvain
Patriots win, such a suprise

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:30 pm
by Markarado
Vikings lost =(

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:01 pm
by Arlos
49ers WON a game, and actually looked good in stretches while doing so. It cannot be real, someone must have slipped some serious amounts of acid into my soda, and it's still Saturday.

-Arlos

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:53 am
by Mop
ravens fucking sucked big time =( boller out so we can now here more qb contrversy for anthony wright who sucks just as much I say trade 2 of the recievers we never use / boller for phillip rivers

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:37 am
by Minrott
I don't know wtf happened to the Vikings.

At least the Packers lost too, so work was bearable.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:41 am
by Lyion
Baltimore's D looked stout against the best O in the league.

The problem with Baltimore is they are trying to make what should be a mostly run O into a balanced O, which is a mistake. They should hammer Jamal and throw vertical.

Boller and Wrigght both do suck. They should've picked up a vet QB two years ago.

San Diego lost to Dallas. Bastards.

Cinci beat Cleveland, but its hard to say how either team will do next week.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:41 am
by Phlegm
javon walker, favre's favorite receiver, tore his acl...out for the season.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:46 am
by Malluas
9ers looked good for like 55 minutes.. for 3 quarters they shut down the rams completely. they did look tired at the end.

But their defense looks good (seeing as it wasn't against a shitty offense) and can shut down some good offenses. They will lose the next 2. But i can see them beating arizona twice and seattle once. and maybe 1-2 more games other than those.

Barlow i think if he has another game like that will lose his starting job to gore. Gore did good when he was in, barlow only did good in pass blocking he hit the same holes as Gore and gained 1 when Gore gained 4.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:31 am
by vonkaar
Dallas looked fucking stellar.

I'll put this on record - if Bledsoe plays like that all season, we are contenders.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:35 am
by Phlegm
Minrott wrote:I don't know wtf happened to the Vikings.

At least the Packers lost too, so work was bearable.


maybe they should've kept Moss. The vikes offense stunk bad.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:51 pm
by Malluas
vonkaar wrote:Dallas looked fucking stellar.

I'll put this on record - if Bledsoe plays like that all season, we are contenders.


he wont so they wont. but might make the playoffs but as a wildcard

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:02 pm
by vonkaar
ESPN put them winning the division and going to the 2nd round... finishing 11-5. Most writers in the city say 10-6.

I say, 16-0.

Just like the Mavs - 82-0.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:34 pm
by Tadpole
Dallas is going to fucking own this year. Drew Bledsoe is a maniac when he actually has time to throw the ball. Dallas has an awesome line (picking up Marco Rivera in FA from Green Bay really helped solidify an already solid line), and with Julius Jones running like he did last season, the play action is going to work brilliantly. Plus Dallas will have a top three defense this year.

They are the team to watch in the NFC.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:39 pm
by Kramer
the Texans laid on their stomachs, greased each others cornholes, raised to their elbows and knees and......

well, you watched it, or at least heard about it

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:56 pm
by Tikker
Tadpole wrote:Dallas ... the team to watch in the NFC.


top NFC team is still like the 7th or 8th best team in the NFL



Pittsburgh looked pretty good against the titans (who are admittedly rebuilding)

always a good time when your 3rd or 4th string RB puts up 160+ yards
Roethlisburger looked ok too

If they can run the ball 40+ times each game they're going to be pretty fucking tough to beat again this year

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:29 pm
by Tadpole
Not this season...there are some good NFC teams out there...Minnestoa rebuilt defense is awesome (they looked awful on sunday though), Eagles good each year, Dallas is going to be a top 5 team this year imo.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:04 pm
by Tikker
Tadpole wrote:Not this season...there are some good NFC teams out there...Minnestoa rebuilt defense is awesome (they looked awful on sunday though), Eagles good each year, Dallas is going to be a top 5 team this year imo.


Eagles will be top NFC team again, and are not as good as Pats, Steelers, Colts, and I think about same ballpark as Chargers, Bills, Ravens

Minnesota's defense might look ok on paper, but that never means shit until they can do something on a sunday

Dallas won't win a playoff game with Bledsoe at quarterback, and their Dbacks are less than intimidating