Moderator: Dictators in Training
mofish wrote:That is exactly the problem labbats. Wal-mart definitely isnt the only company that does that. Id say more companies than not do it, actually. Is it their right?
Sure, if you want to end up like some 2-bit south american country, with a few rich people and tons of poor people. Been heading that way steadily for a couple of decades now anyway. The ever-shrinking US middle class. Uh oh, did I just back-door advocate 'redistribution?' Get the rope!
Tikker wrote:mofish wrote:That is exactly the problem labbats. Wal-mart definitely isnt the only company that does that. Id say more companies than not do it, actually. Is it their right?
Sure, if you want to end up like some 2-bit south american country, with a few rich people and tons of poor people. Been heading that way steadily for a couple of decades now anyway. The ever-shrinking US middle class. Uh oh, did I just back-door advocate 'redistribution?' Get the rope!
the problem isn't walmart
the problem is lazy assed fucktards who think working at walmart should be a viable career
anyone stupid enough to think that working a job that should be reserved for high school kids and college students should pay enough to support a family needs to fall off the gene pool
Ironfang wrote:How is it that every damn CEO in North America seems to get paid so much because the super small handful of competent ones, like Jack Welch, got well paid?
To me this concept that someone who runs a large company for a few years, yet gets a guaranteed $10 million + massive stock options, is unreal.
I mean, are you telling me that their job is that hard that they are worth millions just to make a few difficult decisions that they make someone else do all the work to implement?
The best example I saw was when Daimler purchased Chrysler and the top 3 paid people in the combined company were working in Chrysler. This was after 5 straight years of losses in the purchased company vs. the CEO of Daimler whose company (at the time) was hugely profitable and was getting less than half the compensation.
Damn makes me wish I was part of that old boys network.
(and I work as a mid-senior finance management type so I make good money and know a large amount of what these executives do)
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
Captain_Insano wrote:Kinda like what would happen if black people ran the world
Ironfang wrote:Have you ever worked at a company that fires 5-10% of their staff annually, and does not pay bonuses in order to make some stupid market demanded performance targets? I have, those companies say that their value is in their people, yet the first chance that management gets to maximize their personal net worth they do and screw the rest of the workers with 100 stock options
Ironfang wrote:Gee, CEO's work hard for their money? No shit. However, for everyone who makes it to that level there are another 99 men and women who work just as hard and who don't make it.
Yes, I know that this is a high end job, however where the hell does it say that some reject like Dick Brown, formerly CEO of EDS Inc. deserved to make $10 million annually, plus large stock options, to drive his company into the ground?
The issue that I have with the compensation of CEO's is not that they get paid for performance, but rather that once a "market value" has been established by the old boys network, they all get to point out comparables and get paid a ridiculous sum of money. Once that is done, they get monstrous stock option plans that almost guarantee them to go out and maximize short term performance in order to get a higher selling price.
When of course they can no longer make these insane short term goals anymore, they jump ship to another company, get paid a lot there and leave the shareholders and employee's of their former company holding the bag.
Have you ever worked at a company that fires 5-10% of their staff annually, and does not pay bonuses in order to make some stupid market demanded performance targets? I have, those companies say that their value is in their people, yet the first chance that management gets to maximize their personal net worth they do and screw the rest of the workers with 100 stock options.
There is no reason in my mind that a large company that pays senior level executives $300k-$500k should have to pay the CEO an annual price tag of $5 million. There is no way that a CEO is doing work that is worth 10 times as much as other senior executives.
That is my bitch, and yes, if you think it is communist to say FUCK OFF as an investor and employee, then I guess I am a commie.
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
Goose_Man wrote:I like how people bitch about how so and so makes X amount of money.
Sounds like you're a bit jealous...
I have an idea. Instead of getting up in arms and worrying about what Mr. CEO is making per year, why don’t you go channel your energy into making your own millions?
Oh I know why, you’re a lazy sheep who blames his money problems on outside forces instead of looking at him self...
WAAAHHHHH WAAHHHHH he makes 10 mil per year and I don’t!! WAAHHHHHH
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests