Moderator: Dictators in Training
Eziekial wrote:http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2005/tst062705.htm
Seems like our government can't sit by and allow millions of children suffer from mental disorders even if they don't have any. Not only is a mandatory screening overstepping the boundary of government, it undermines parental control over children which is the last thing we need to do more of in this country.
Yamori wrote:That aside, this seems strange to do, since most serious mental illness comes about in young adulthood (16-30), not childhood.
-Psychiatric diagnoses are inherently subjective and based on “social constructions”;
They arent looking for schizophrenia, OCD, and the other serious psychosis Yammy,
veeneedefeesh wrote:It is bad enough that teachers now send kids home saying that they are ADHD and "you should put him on Ridalin". What is really sad is that many parents allow the teacher to make this diagnosis and then follow through on it "for the child's good. (hello a bachelors in english doesnt qualify you to make psychaitric diagnosis) but now they will have the "Scientific" backup to require that these children are placed on drugs. At least now you have the option of saying "kiss my ass you arent going to put my kids on narcotics just because you are too stupid/lazy to teach him/her in a way that they benefit from".
Why does it not surprise me that this is coming from the White house? I am telling you by 2008 we will be living in Big Brother land and the concept of your inalienable human rights will be alien...
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Phlegm wrote:What the fuck is wrong with you people? Havent you guys been listening to Tom Cruise?
Psychiatry and mood altering drugs are evil. Evil, he tells you.
Araby wrote:Phlegm wrote:What the fuck is wrong with you people? Havent you guys been listening to Tom Cruise?
Psychiatry and mood altering drugs are evil. Evil, he tells you.
I heard that interview this morning, well, most of his interview with Matt Lauer anyway.
Honestly, I've always felt the same way, but not like he does. What I mean for myself, is that I"ve always been strongly against anti-depressants and other mood-altering drugs, when what can make you better is inside yourself.
Tom Cruise has lost his mind though.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Honestly, I've always felt the same way, but not like he does. What I mean for myself, is that I"ve always been strongly against anti-depressants and other mood-altering drugs, when what can make you better is inside yourself. You're only treating some symptoms, and ignoring the total problem.
I"ve always been strongly against anti-depressants and other mood-altering drugs, when what can make you better is inside yourself. You're only treating some symptoms, and ignoring the total problem.
Eziekial wrote:Don't our minds control the chemicals in our bodies?
lyion wrote:What a bizarre answer.
His point was to not put drugs into your mind since it can regulate itself, and your answer was yeah, well put drugs in and see how well it regulates...
I'm a tad perplexed.
Anyways, the simple answer is we have no deep knowledge and the answer is far too often to medicate to 'fix' where the body might be better off without the drugs.
It's vastly different than a drug one takes for personal pleasure that fucks up your brain, or something someone needs like Insulin.
Strange, strange comparisons.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests