You have proposed a trade with Minrott
Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training
You have proposed a trade with Minrott
For Terrell team cancer Owens.
right there with you...
but then, I was the last pick in a 16-team league, so... that sucks. Only thing I'm happy with is my defense pick, but that NEVER does enough to matter.
but then, I was the last pick in a 16-team league, so... that sucks. Only thing I'm happy with is my defense pick, but that NEVER does enough to matter.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Zanchief wrote:Two things of note from being at the draft.
QBs were going like crazy. I had to reach to draft Eli because there was litterally nothing left. That's why some of you probably got some crappy QBs. Also, the people that were live kept going after defense when it's a pretty useless position.
imo defense and tight ends are what wins games most times
there's not a lot of difference between the top 10-15 running backs, but after Gonzalez and Gates there's a big drop off in TE production
same with top 5 defenses vs the rest
Tikker wrote:there's not a lot of difference between the top 10-15 running backs, but after Gonzalez and Gates there's a big drop off in TE production
Couldn't disagree more. RBs are what win games. Alexander, LT, and LJ will singlehandedly win games for people.
The Top 3 RBs put up over 200 Fantasy points. The 14th and 15th fantasy RBs put up under 100 points. You cut your productivity in HALF going from 1 to 15.
There's a HUGE dropoff from different RBs. Check their stats. TEs are a dime a dozen, and Gonzalez is not a big point guy from a fantasy standpoint. Shockey, Heap, and Cooley will all probably have more fantasy points than Gates and Gonzo this year. Either way, its likely no TE will break 100 points. The top tier RBs will break 200 giving a lot more value.
Defense is a crapshoot. RBs are money. QBs are valuable, but the dropoff from the top QB to the 10th ranked is less than 3 points a week.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
– C. S. Lewis
– C. S. Lewis
If someone is desperate for a QB, I've got Michael Vick sitting on the bench. Only took him when I did cause last year you could assign a couple people to "flex" spots, where they'd earn you points, but didn't have to be in one of the QB/RB/WR/etc slots, and I figured on putting him in there. Since we don't have that....
So, I'll listen to good offers for him. No, sorry, I won't trade him straight up for Kurt Warner, which someone actually offered me. heh.
-Arlos
So, I'll listen to good offers for him. No, sorry, I won't trade him straight up for Kurt Warner, which someone actually offered me. heh.
-Arlos
arlos wrote:So, I'll listen to good offers for him. No, sorry, I won't trade him straight up for Kurt Warner, which someone actually offered me. heh.
-Arlos
It always amazes me the amount of just shitty rip-off trade offers I get in FFLs. I almost never trade because people are dumb and want to get something for nothing.
C'mon, that's a square deal.
Riiiiight. At BEST it's a side-grade, and I expect Warner to get replaced by Leinart by halfway into the season anyway. What possible reason is there for me to do that deal to begin with? I don't NEED a QB, why would I trade a QB just to trade a QB, especially when I get back someone who I like less?
You want Vick, offer me a useful RB or WR; those're positions I could stand upgrading. I've already got Peyton for my QB, and Gates for my TE, so those're completely set.
Any trade should, ideally, make sense for both sides. Vick's an asset, I'm not going to move him unless I get tangible benefit back that makes sense for ME. No, I'm not going to land a LT or Shaun Alexander with him, he's not that valuable, but he's no scrub, either.
-Arlos





