namelesstavern.net

by **Diekan** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:22 pm

Had NO business starting Big accidentprone Ben. I don't care what anyone says - he was not 100% He acted like he was afraid to get hit, couldn't put the ball where it needed to be and over all just played like shit.

Pittsburgh got beat by a sub-par team because of a stupid decision to put their golden boy back in before he was ready.

by **Tikker** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:25 pm

it's not over yet

but i agree, Batch should have started this game
he looked ok at times, but really looked scared to get hit at others

by **Diekan** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:30 pm

hey many players do think have tapped Suzy Kolber?

by **Tikker** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:34 pm

hopefully none in the last 10 years, jeje

by **Diekan** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:34 pm

haha

yeah, but you know she's gone "4th and goal" more than a few times.

by **Tikker** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:35 pm

maybe, who knows

back on topic tho

Jags played a really good game (despite how poorly Ben played)

by **Diekan** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:39 pm

well they've got to face Indy next weekend, so we'll see if they're "for real" or not.

by **Lyion** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:33 am

Diekan wrote:Had NO business starting Big accidentprone Ben. I don't care what anyone says - he was not 100% He acted like he was afraid to get hit, couldn't put the ball where it needed to be and over all just played like shit.

Pittsburgh got beat by a sub-par team because of a stupid decision to put their golden boy back in before he was ready.

Jax beat both Pitt and New England last year, and is far from a subpar team.

They are an AFC playoff team, and a good one.

If Pitt had played Batch, they probably would've been beat by more, as even a 90% Roethlisberger is better than a 100% Batch.

We'll see what shape Ben is in at home against Cinci.

by **Reynaldo** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:03 am

The hitting last night was one of the best games I've watched in years. Lots of "ooooh!" moments.

They'll be able to run exponentially better on CIN, so Ben will look back to form with the play action stuff.

by **Tikker** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:08 am

Reynaldo wrote:The hitting last night was one of the best games I've watched in years. Lots of "ooooh!" moments.

They'll be able to run exponentially better on CIN, so Ben will look back to form with the play action stuff.

I think he'll be fine

if you look at the game, Ben and Hines just weren't in sync yet

Hines catches that long bomb in the first quarter, steelers end up winning the game 21-3 i bet

/shrug

Jags are a good team, the fact that the steelers offense did nothing all game, yet they only lost 9-0 seems to me that they're going to be alright if they start hitting some plays later on

by **Lyion** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:12 am

Reynaldo wrote:The hitting last night was one of the best games I've watched in years. Lots of "ooooh!" moments.

They'll be able to run exponentially better on CIN, so Ben will look back to form with the play action stuff.

I wouldnt count on it. Did you see what Cinci did to Larry Johnson?

If Cinci comes out and guns two TDs early, it'll take the Pitt running game out of the equation, which I think is Marv's plan.

I agree this was a good game. Jax is a damn good team, and the hitting was good to watch.

Jax needs to change gears though and it'll be interesting to see how they do against Manning @ Indy.

by **Diekan** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:55 am

I'll wage goat points now that Indy will destroy them.

by **Lyion** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:06 am

How many points are you giving me? Give me 14, and I'll take that bet.

by **Reynaldo** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:53 am

Indy always beats Jax, but the final is always like 16-13. No matter where it's played.

by **Diekan** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:36 am

lyion wrote:How many points are you giving me? Give me 14, and I'll take that bet.

4000 goats and you I'll give you 10.

by **Lyion** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:58 am

C'mon. 10 points isn't destroying. I want at least 13!

by **Phlegm** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:03 pm

Vegas lists Colts -7.

by **Diekan** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:30 pm

lyion wrote:C'mon. 10 points isn't destroying. I want at least 13!

Alright, fuck it - they're only goats.... I'll give you the 14 points. I think Mannings passing game is going to create serious problems for J-ville's D.

by **Xaiveir** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:41 pm

I agree with diek....i think manning will give Jacksonville some troubles, but there are not alot of teams that are succesful against manning. They are playing in Indy, colts win 24-10 :wink:

As far as Ben and the Steelers go, i think a 80% ben is better than Batch at 100%. I cant fualt them for letting Ben play the game, they have ridden him the last 2 years, if he says he is ready to play...then let him play. I think the "scared" to get hit comment was right, he did seem alittle tentative to get hit. However if i have Stroud and Henderson (6-6, 316 and 6'7" 325 resp.) coming down on me, i would be alittle shy of getting hit too. Best duo of interior lineman in the league imho :bowdown:

by **Tikker** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:27 pm

in the system they run, i honestly don't think that Batch is much of a downgrade from Roethlisburger

the only realy difference is that Roethlisberger is fucking hard to tackle
I don't think he throws the ball any better than Batch

by **Harrison** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:54 pm

I don't think he did too badly.

Jacksonville's runningback was a fucking machine though, reminded me of oldschool Barry Sanders once or twice.

by **Lyion** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:07 pm

Fred Taylor always has had flashes of brilliance, coupled with unfinished seasons on IR.

by **Tikker** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:28 pm

Taylor is usually only good against the Steelers, heh

It really didn't help that Palamalu was playing with only 1 arm

he was totally ineffective

by **Diekan** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:53 pm

4000 goats and you get 14 points, yay or nay?

by **Lyion** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:18 pm

I'm in for 4000 goats~

All your goats are belong to us.

namelesstavern.net

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Re: Pittsburgh

Who is online