Moderator: Dictators in Training
leah wrote:that smoking ban thing is pretty exciting for non-smokers, though. i remember how excited i was the first time i went out to the bars in lincoln and came home NOT smelling like stank, stale smoke. i was able to pass out without showering, wake up in the morning, and still be able to stand smelling myself. hurrah!
arlos wrote:California has an even stronger smoking ban than the one Gaazy talked about. You can't smoke in *ANY* public building in California, period. Not in bars, not in restaurants, nothing. It's been a real boon to people like my father, who as I've mentioned previously, is hyper-sensitive to smoke, due to severe asthma. Smokers here have to go otuside to smoke, which is especially humorous when it's cold, windy and rainy, seeing them huddled together like sheep in sleet, puffing away on their cancer sticks.
-Arlos
Zanchief wrote:arlos wrote:California has an even stronger smoking ban than the one Gaazy talked about. You can't smoke in *ANY* public building in California, period. Not in bars, not in restaurants, nothing. It's been a real boon to people like my father, who as I've mentioned previously, is hyper-sensitive to smoke, due to severe asthma. Smokers here have to go otuside to smoke, which is especially humorous when it's cold, windy and rainy, seeing them huddled together like sheep in sleet, puffing away on their cancer sticks.
-Arlos
We have the same deal here in Ottawa. We were one of, if not the first, city in North America to have a smoking ban in all public buildings. People went apeshit when it was first introduced, saying bars would close, restaurants wouldn't be making any money, and within a few months everything stabilized and I don't have to specify smoking or non when I go get some grub.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests