So this guy at work

Sidle up to the bar (Lightly Moderated)

Moderator: Dictators in Training

So this guy at work

Postby The Kizzy » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:39 am

Finds out recently that he is a Dad. No big deal right? His ex girlfriend cheated on him, and she left him for another man, almost 12 years ago.They move to San Angelo, get married and have a daughter together. Jump ahead to about 7 months ago, and they get into a huge fight. She tells the husband that their 11 yr old daughter is probably not his, and he leaves. So the guy at work, gets a visit from teh Sheriffs department, and has to drive down to take a paternity test. It's his. He has had no clue for the last 11 years. He pays child support now, and makes it down about twice a month to spend the weekend with his daughter. Great, to me this means he is stepping up and is taking responsibilty. The thing is, now his ex is suing him for 11 years of back child support. Is this not like double dipping? I mean the man who believed he was the father has already supported her for 11 years (and then to just up and cut her out of his life, asshole) now she wants a big chunk payment. Is this even legal?
Zanchief wrote:
Harrison wrote:I'm not dead


Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
User avatar
The Kizzy
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 15193
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: In the closet with the ghosts

Postby vonkaar » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:59 am

She'll probably win... especially in Texas.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
User avatar
vonkaar
Sexy Ass
Sexy Ass
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 9:03 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby Zanchief » Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:14 am

Wow, she should die of cancer. The kind of cancer Canadians don't have a cure for.
User avatar
Zanchief
Chief Wahoo
Chief Wahoo
 
Posts: 14532
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:31 pm

Postby Tikker » Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:50 am

there's no way she should be able to win

shit, there's no way he should have to pay now, unless he wants to
she married another man after leaving him, that usually severs all spousal responsibility
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Postby Maeya » Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:57 am

Man, I *hate* it when women are greedy bitches about stuff like that. While I can see child support being a useful and appropriate policy in some cases, more and more often I just see it being abused so the mom can buy her fucking new SUV while the father has to decide which bills will be unpaid that month. Grrr child support.
Maeya
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:56 am

Postby Darcler » Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:23 am

vonkaar wrote:She'll probably win... especially in Texas.


It's true :(
User avatar
Darcler
Saran Wrap Princess
Saran Wrap Princess
 
Posts: 7161
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby Phlegm » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:06 pm

Tikker wrote:there's no way she should be able to win

shit, there's no way he should have to pay now, unless he wants to
she married another man after leaving him, that usually severs all spousal responsibility


She is not asking for spousal support. She is asking for child support and she probably will get it too.
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby Evermore » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:29 pm

Tikker wrote:there's no way she should be able to win

shit, there's no way he should have to pay now, unless he wants to
she married another man after leaving him, that usually severs all spousal responsibility


doesnt end child support obligations thou
For you
Image
User avatar
Evermore
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:46 am

Postby Tikker » Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:15 pm

Evermore wrote:
Tikker wrote:there's no way she should be able to win

shit, there's no way he should have to pay now, unless he wants to
she married another man after leaving him, that usually severs all spousal responsibility


doesnt end child support obligations thou


hrm

I think it does here, but I'm not 100% sure
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Postby Evermore » Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:27 pm

its 18 in the US unless child goes to college. then its 25
For you
Image
User avatar
Evermore
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:46 am

Postby Dimuza » Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:34 pm

wow. what a bitch
User avatar
Dimuza
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:17 am

Postby Narrock » Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:35 pm

Dimuza wrote:wow. what a bitch
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Narrock
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Postby Phlegm » Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:04 pm

He should sue for custody of his daughter.
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby araby » Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:07 pm

Phlegm wrote:He should sue for custody of his daughter.


I did this, and it backfired on me and they went for the highest amount of child support I could possibly pay (460/month) and said, "we'll resume custodial rights at another date" which was clever of my child's father's attorney, because it meant that the little money I had saved to spend on the attorney in order for this to happen was spent-add these court fees to it and it =no more court dates while this chick has no money.

it's an unjust system with holes all in it.
Image
User avatar
araby
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 7818
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:53 am
Location: Charleston, South Carolina

Postby Phlegm » Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:10 pm

So, what happened at the custody hearing? Did you win?
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby araby » Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:12 pm

Phlegm wrote:So, what happened at the custody hearing? Did you win?


no. we had joint custody at the time. I was asking for more of that time to be with me, and instead of addressing the custodial issue, they changed it to "temporary full custody" with the father, giving me every other weekend and two days every other week, and added that I pay child support through the courts at 460/month and that wasn't including the attorney's fees, making it an additional 150 for a year.
Image
User avatar
araby
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 7818
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:53 am
Location: Charleston, South Carolina

Postby Jesus » Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:48 pm

Kizzy, who's name is on the birth certificate and who has been taking care of the child up until this point?

It has been established and accepted that the "stepfather" was in fact accepted as the true father for the past 11 years. The "stepfather" also accepted this child as his own for the past 11 years.

If my memory serves, the "guy you work with" is probably not liable.

-Adam
Jesus
NT Bixie
NT Bixie
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:15 am
Location: Iraq

Postby The Kizzy » Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:12 pm

The other guys name was. I told him about a guy in Texas who had 4 kids and him and his wife got divorced. He finds out later, that three of hte four kids were not his, but he still has to pay child support on them because the whore...er..I mean mother refused to name the fatehr, and someone has to support the kids. Anyone from Texas remember this story?
Zanchief wrote:
Harrison wrote:I'm not dead


Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
User avatar
The Kizzy
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 15193
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: In the closet with the ghosts

Postby Dimuza » Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:27 am

I remember that story, but not the name of the guy. what stuck in my memory was just how fucked up that whole scenario was
User avatar
Dimuza
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:17 am

Postby kinghooter00 » Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:35 am

damn, it all sounds pretty fucked up to me.
User avatar
kinghooter00
Captain Google
Captain Google
 
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: Venice, Florida

Postby runamonk » Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:36 pm

Tikker wrote:there's no way she should be able to win

shit, there's no way he should have to pay now, unless he wants to
she married another man after leaving him, that usually severs all spousal responsibility


Sadly this is totally 100% wrong. Especially in places like California or Washington. In washington, she wouldn't have had to sue him to get the money. It's really sad and has gotten out of hand. =(
runamonk
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4083
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:59 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: So this guy at work

Postby Diekan » Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:41 pm

The Kizzy wrote:Finds out recently that he is a Dad. No big deal right? His ex girlfriend cheated on him, and she left him for another man, almost 12 years ago.They move to San Angelo, get married and have a daughter together. Jump ahead to about 7 months ago, and they get into a huge fight. She tells the husband that their 11 yr old daughter is probably not his, and he leaves. So the guy at work, gets a visit from teh Sheriffs department, and has to drive down to take a paternity test. It's his. He has had no clue for the last 11 years. He pays child support now, and makes it down about twice a month to spend the weekend with his daughter. Great, to me this means he is stepping up and is taking responsibilty. The thing is, now his ex is suing him for 11 years of back child support. Is this not like double dipping? I mean the man who believed he was the father has already supported her for 11 years (and then to just up and cut her out of his life, asshole) now she wants a big chunk payment. Is this even legal?


This reminds me of another thread.... anyone else wanna ask why it's a "good idea" to adopt a kid that isn't yours?
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Postby Tikker » Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:46 pm

araby wrote:
Phlegm wrote:So, what happened at the custody hearing? Did you win?


no. we had joint custody at the time. I was asking for more of that time to be with me, and instead of addressing the custodial issue, they changed it to "temporary full custody" with the father, giving me every other weekend and two days every other week, and added that I pay child support through the courts at 460/month and that wasn't including the attorney's fees, making it an additional 150 for a year.


I hate to be a dick, and this isn't aimed at you Araby, but this shit has been going against the father for so long, it's kinda nice to see the father get custody once in a while
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Postby araby » Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:04 pm

Tikker wrote:
araby wrote:
Phlegm wrote:So, what happened at the custody hearing? Did you win?


no. we had joint custody at the time. I was asking for more of that time to be with me, and instead of addressing the custodial issue, they changed it to "temporary full custody" with the father, giving me every other weekend and two days every other week, and added that I pay child support through the courts at 460/month and that wasn't including the attorney's fees, making it an additional 150 for a year.


I hate to be a dick, and this isn't aimed at you Araby, but this shit has been going against the father for so long, it's kinda nice to see the father get custody once in a while


it's okay, I feel the same way, trust me I am not ignorant to the kind of parenting that shouldn't be allowed I am certainly against using custody as a reward, or award, for one of the parents, especially based on marital conduct.

the system, and I've posted about it before, is not just, and does not in any way seem to have the child's best interest in mind, though it claims to do that.

in my particular situation, the one I mentioned above, I was ambushed and then made to be a fool. Having spent all the money I had saved for an attorney, and after being told that not only were they not going to grant me more visiting rights at the time, but that they would increase my payments and go back to the custodial issue at a later date (or when I could raise more money-whichever came first) I was pretty much sobbing the entire time, and when I finally got myself to walk out of the court room, my child's father, attorneys and the judge were talking about whichever sports game was on tv the night before, and laughing about it. I'll never forget that.
Image
User avatar
araby
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 7818
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:53 am
Location: Charleston, South Carolina

Postby Dimuza » Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:38 pm

If you keep talking like that I'm pretty sure you'll get kicked out of the union, Araby ;)

You're supposed to say something like "Pigs pigs, men are pigs, and all children should be with their mother..."
User avatar
Dimuza
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:17 am

Next

Return to Cap's Alehouse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

cron