Yeah, you'll get the bill later, and it may be an astronomical amount
And you think that's better? So what does that do to the elderly or the poor who can't afford healthcare to begin with? It puts them in an even worse situation.
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Yeah, you'll get the bill later, and it may be an astronomical amount
arlos wrote:But that's the thing, having that bill hanging over your head can fuck you for a very long time. Wage garnishment, screwed credit rating, etc. etc. etc. Why should someone who is legitimately sick and can't afford insurance have to go through that just to get seen by a doctor? I'm not even discussing welfare cases here, there's 10s of millions of people working full time at good jobs who can't afford insurance, and more and more employers aren't providing it because it costs too much.
That's just not right, it's not. We NEED some kind of universal health care system. Our current system is totally out of whack. My dad has been involved in the health care field since 1970. He said all he's seen happen over the last 40 years is levels of care and availability of care go way down while the costs have gone way up. It's sad to think the situation was better 40 years ago than it is now, desptie all of the medical advances since then.
SOMETHING needs to get done, and any politician that has a realistic plan for making it happen is going to get my very careful attention. That's one reason why I am willing to give the Governator a chance, for his promises to do it unilaterally in CA.
-Arlos
Zanchief wrote:I never understood why your health is something that should be tied to your wealth.
arlos wrote:So what? Don't let blind fear of "ism's" blind you. Borrowing an idea from an ideology doesn't mean we need to adopt all of the rest of its ideas. It IS possible to borrow good ideas from other ideologies and groups and adapt them to our own society and needs.
-Arlos
arlos wrote:I wasn't only referring just to you, Mindia. You and I both know that there are millions of Christians out there who DON'T donate like you are, yes?
And again, remember how much your employer is currently paying monthly for your insurance. I'd be willing to bet (based on my experience at COBRA payments) that it's on the order of 200 a month. I am 99.99% sure you'd have more in your pocket every month if YOU got that $200 a month directly, despite the extra taxes that would be charged to pay for health care.
-Arlos
Narrock wrote:Yes, your scenario sounds good on paper, or pixelated in this case :P but that would be in a perfect world. Do you really really think it would go down like that?
Tossica wrote:Eliminate insurance companies all together and the problem is solved.
lyion wrote:Tossica wrote:Eliminate insurance companies all together and the problem is solved.
Sure, we'd just run out of Doctors when they were all sued to oblivion without the coverage to protect them.
Tort reform is equally, if not moreso, needed than insurance reform.
Sadly, our medical industry costs are all related to things other than treatment and service, which is at the crux of the problem.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests