namelesstavern.net

by **Martrae** » Wed Jun 30, 2004 11:26 pm

Johnn of War wrote:
Athrok wrote:
Evermore wrote:
Project DARC wrote:
Gniltunmai wrote:
Mudcrush Durtfeet wrote:No Fucking Way.

I call bullshit. You guys will bitch and moan and in the end break down and buy it 'just to see'.

by **Harrison** » Wed Jun 30, 2004 11:44 pm

Yeah you people very well damned know youll try it.

by **Captain Insano** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:48 am

I'm really disappointed about them cancelling Warhammer online.. that game looked sickass pimpshit. I don't give a fuck about EQ2, and don't care much about WoW. I think Wow might manage to keep my attention a bit longer than diablo II, but thats about it. The whole game looks too damn simplistic.

by **Lyion** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:54 am

ralfmacchio wrote:I'm really disappointed about them cancelling Warhammer online.. that game looked sickass pimpshit. I don't give a fuck about EQ2, and don't care much about WoW. I think Wow might manage to keep my attention a bit longer than diablo II, but thats about it. The whole game looks too damn simplistic.

Ditto. I was really stoked about Warhammer. I'm in WOW beta, and while it's fun and rights a lot of EQ wrongs, its essentially EQ done correctly. I'm not sure if I'm really interested in doing EQ again.

by **DangerPaul** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 8:03 am

Martrae wrote:
Johnn of War wrote:
Athrok wrote:
Evermore wrote:
Project DARC wrote:
Gniltunmai wrote:
Mudcrush Durtfeet wrote:No Fucking Way.

I call bullshit. You guys will bitch and moan and in the end break down and buy it 'just to see'.

No, I really won't. I am done with online gaming. I loved original EQ due to the people, the being lost in a big world feel, the being a complete noob to a MMO, I can never get that feeling back of seeing gods among men walking around me in Full Plate duel wielding SSoYs. I was thinking of WoW, but the game has been over hyped, and I know no mater what I do, I won't get that old first year of EQ feeling back.

by **Evermore** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:22 pm

No way mar. When this ends i have had enough of Sony.

by **Martrae** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:48 pm

I said that too, Ever. And here I am.

by **Bodin** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:36 pm

No here. Trying to find an MMORPG like SWG where you don't need 10 hours a day to raid.

(But with content)

No more money from me to SOE, I was suckered into SWG.

by **Dylan** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:10 pm

Gniltunmai wrote:
Martrae wrote:
Johnn of War wrote:
Athrok wrote:
Evermore wrote:
Project DARC wrote:
Gniltunmai wrote:
Mudcrush Durtfeet wrote:No Fucking Way.

I call bullshit. You guys will bitch and moan and in the end break down and buy it 'just to see'.

No, I really won't. I am done with online gaming. I loved original EQ due to the people, the being lost in a big world feel, the being a complete noob to a MMO, I can never get that feeling back of seeing gods among men walking around me in Full Plate duel wielding SSoYs. I was thinking of WoW, but the game has been over hyped, and I know no mater what I do, I won't get that old first year of EQ feeling back.

The way I feel 100%

by **Captain Insano** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:46 pm

Lyion wrote:
ralfmacchio wrote:I'm really disappointed about them cancelling Warhammer online.. that game looked sickass pimpshit. I don't give a fuck about EQ2, and don't care much about WoW. I think Wow might manage to keep my attention a bit longer than diablo II, but thats about it. The whole game looks too damn simplistic.

Ditto. I was really stoked about Warhammer. I'm in WOW beta, and while it's fun and rights a lot of EQ wrongs, its essentially EQ done correctly. I'm not sure if I'm really interested in doing EQ again.

One thing that has kept my interest in EQ, was that after 4+ years of off and on playing I still don't know every zone, every strategy needed to be successful, and have much much much left to do. Not to mention for every enounter there are many different ways to approach it, which adds a complexity to the game that I enjoyed.

Now I look at WoW and the blizzard website makes it look like each class get 15-20 spells. I enjoy playing casters, but having only 15-20 spells leads me to believe that there is really very little in the way of strategy and versatility to the classes. Meaning ,a simple game ie Diablo-like. While fun for a time, ends up being more of a click-fest than anything.

Am I wrong? Also, can this game be owned by a zerg guild?

by **Nayana** » Thu Jul 01, 2004 11:38 pm

dunno /shtug it all depends on how bad it is

by **runamonk** » Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:43 am

Andraxus Lupinedeth wrote:Heyas Zennish!

Also heyas Thon, Mudcrush, Kalec and a few others I recognized!

Have you started looking for guilds yet Zennish? I am looking to find a hardcore guild to start with in that game. (They say that it is tailored towards the casual player, but I am willing there will be content for the hardcore). I have checked out a few of the prospective guilds and some seem fun. I would much prefer to join some familiar faces from The Nameless though, especially if they are interested in doing endgame stuff as fast as possible. If any of you moving over to EQ2 want to try and hook up on game release post here, or feel free to e-mail me at andraxuseq@yahoo.com.

(Retired)Andaris Lupinedeth <---------Used to own Thon as Mayadar in /duels
65th Storm Warden
The Nameless

I think I have a spot reserved in EoTA.

by **runamonk** » Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:45 am

ralfmacchio wrote:I'm really disappointed about them cancelling Warhammer online.. that game looked sickass pimpshit. I don't give a fuck about EQ2, and don't care much about WoW. I think Wow might manage to keep my attention a bit longer than diablo II, but thats about it. The whole game looks too damn simplistic.

We need Maverick and Goose man. Take one for the team bro.

by **Lyion** » Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:15 am

runamonk wrote:
I think I have a spot reserved in EoTA.

Hmm, whatever happened to Kayla? She still around?

by **Captain Insano** » Fri Jul 02, 2004 4:45 pm

runamonk wrote:
ralfmacchio wrote:I'm really disappointed about them cancelling Warhammer online.. that game looked sickass pimpshit. I don't give a fuck about EQ2, and don't care much about WoW. I think Wow might manage to keep my attention a bit longer than diablo II, but thats about it. The whole game looks too damn simplistic.

We need Maverick and Goose man. Take one for the team bro.

hahah... I'm trying to get goosse to agree to Shatner (me) and Hasselhoff (goosse).

- Karmie Sutra - · by **Karmie** » Sat Jul 03, 2004 1:38 pm

looks pretty cool, I'd prolly try it~

by **Ginwen** » Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:29 am

If my computer can play it, I'll try it out.

by **Caladore Buhbong** » Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:34 am

No.

WoW is looking too good.

Only way I would play is if WoW completely tanks and all the people that are playing EQ2 that played EQ1 on the higher end said that they got thier shit together. I cant see me playing another game that has potential of putting out shit like Gates.

by **Project DARC** » Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:52 am

Sony shall get no more money and more importantly no more time from me.

by **Skraggz** » Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:16 pm

After buying and playing SWG and seeing what they did with that piece of Sh$t I seriously doubt Im going to invest the $2500.00 it will take for me to buy EQ2.

namelesstavern.net

Anyone gonna play EQ2?

Re: HELL NO

Re: HELL NO

Re: HELL NO

Re: Zennish!!!

Re: Zennish!!!

Who is online