namelesstavern.net

by **Phlegm** » Thu May 03, 2007 6:03 pm

is on MSNBC right now if you guys are interested in watching.

by **Lyion** » Thu May 03, 2007 8:04 pm

I hate the fact that election cycles never seem to end. We just had a frickin election a few months ago, and the primaries are a long ways away.

This is the problem with the oversaturation with media now a days.

I watched a little of this one, and a little of the DNC one and both were a huge waste of time.

by **Ganzo** » Thu May 03, 2007 8:14 pm

thats why nothing actualy geting done, cause all they do is worry about elections

by **Naethyn** » Fri May 04, 2007 7:46 am

Ganzo wrote:thats why nothing actualy geting done, cause all they do is worry about elections

Scary words.

by **Martrae** » Fri May 04, 2007 8:06 am

Naethyn wrote:
Ganzo wrote:thats why nothing actualy geting done, cause all they do is worry about elections

Scary words.

True, though.

Elections and poll results (which might affect elections) are all they care about.

We should go back to states appointing Senators again. Making Senators electable by the populace is really where we went wrong.

by **araby** » Fri May 04, 2007 10:43 am

who knew about Romney?

Yah, it is early. It's never too early to get to know the candidates though and I like the idea of getting a head start on that. You know there will be so much more to follow, and just wait for the shit-slinging. It's coming! This way, they have plenty of time for all of that.

I hate watching the after-math..and the way the analysts put it all into perspective for the viewers. That part seems like it is as important as the debates themselves, if you actually buy into what they say and many people do.

by **Harrison** » Fri May 04, 2007 10:54 am

Romney is a fucking tool.

by **araby** » Fri May 04, 2007 10:56 am

Harrison wrote:Romney is a fucking tool.

how so?

by **Harrison** » Fri May 04, 2007 10:58 am

After living in MA I have a pretty strong dislike of any politician who ran this freak show at any point in time.

by **araby** » Fri May 04, 2007 10:59 am

Harrison wrote:After living in MA I have a pretty strong dislike of any politician who ran this freak show at any point in time.

what are you strong dislikes? what do you base those on? why he is a tool?

by **Harrison** » Fri May 04, 2007 11:02 am

That would require a load of typing I am not willing to suffer through :wink:

Now if only I could have Arlos or Lueyen Syndrome for a few minutes...

by **Zanchief** » Fri May 04, 2007 11:06 am

araby wrote:
Harrison wrote:After living in MA I have a pretty strong dislike of any politician who ran this freak show at any point in time.

what are you strong dislikes? what do you base those on? why he is a tool?

good luck

by **araby** » Fri May 04, 2007 11:10 am

Harrison wrote:That would require a load of typing I am not willing to suffer through

Now if only I could have Arlos or Lueyen Syndrome for a few minutes...

don't expect me to take you seriously unless you're willing to explain yourself.

by **Lueyen** » Fri May 04, 2007 11:16 am

Harrison wrote:That would require a load of typing I am not willing to suffer through

Now if only I could have Arlos or Lueyen Syndrome for a few minutes...

Come, join the dark side :devil2:

by **Yamori** » Fri May 04, 2007 2:46 pm

Martrae wrote:
Naethyn wrote:
Ganzo wrote:thats why nothing actualy geting done, cause all they do is worry about elections

Scary words.

True, though.

Elections and poll results (which might affect elections) are all they care about.

We should go back to states appointing Senators again. Making Senators electable by the populace is really where we went wrong.

The problem is - who would they appoint, and by what standard?

I think the better solution is to limit senate and house members to *ONE* term only.

by **Martrae** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:34 pm

Just do it the way it was originally set up in the Constitution. Senators were appointed by the individual state legislature and are supposed to champion state rights instead of federal.

by **Alphonso** » Sun May 06, 2007 10:08 am

Correct me if im wrong, but didnt Romney leave MA around a billion dollars in debt?

by **numatu** » Sun May 06, 2007 7:41 pm

Alphonso wrote:Correct me if im wrong, but didnt Romney leave MA around a billion dollars in debt?

In Massachusetts, Democrats outnumber Republicans in both houses of the state legislature by an insane margin. I believe it's somewhere around 140-20 in the House of Reps and 35-5 in the Senate. They've had this 'super' majority in the General Court (what the state legislature is called in MA) for decades.

Just pointing this out because knowing these numbers, it's impossible for any single Republican Governor to solely leave the state in debt.

Deval Patrick recently blamed Romney for the deficit after taking office this year. It's scary to think that people in this state will believe virtually anything.

by **Eziekial** » Sun May 06, 2007 8:42 pm

Isn't this the first state to allow "gay" marriages? I seem to recall some bull dyke celeb running up there to get in line at a courthouse or was that New Hampshire?

by **Harrison** » Sun May 06, 2007 8:47 pm

R.I. residents can hop over the water to get married here too, yes.

by **Eziekial** » Sun May 06, 2007 8:51 pm

Nice. Like the Big Dig wasn't enough notoriety.

by **Harrison** » Sun May 06, 2007 8:54 pm

I despise this entire state.

namelesstavern.net

GOP debate

GOP debate

Who is online