Moderator: Dictators in Training
you do, troll.Ginzburgh wrote:You're a fat fuck and no one cares.
leah wrote:in my years of experience i've decided that it just isn't sustainable long-term to cut out large swaths of your diet. it's better to learn how to use food as fuel
HyPhY GhEtTo MaMi wrote:GeT ofF mAh OvaRiEz
Gypsiyee wrote:there is such thing as too much meat..
brinstar wrote:Gypsiyee wrote:there is such thing as too much meat..
unfortunately, that's what she said ;\
Drem wrote:i think the only really important dietary aspect of your life is your intake of high fructose syrup. because it should be none
much more important than other fads or reverse evolution like vegetarianism or "gluten free" or the atkins crap
there's really nothing in our diets i'm tragically afraid of except high fructose corn syrup. because even in moderation it's still terrible for you. i haven't had soda for years and i don't miss it at all. my skin is healthier and i feel a lot better than i ever did (i used to drink soda a lot. a lot. mountain dew & video games plz)
juice two oranges + one lemon + one lime with some ice and that's all i need baby
PS: leah's right. as soon as you start eating carbs again you'll gain the weight back. also gordon ramsay says atkins lowers your libido. /pass
Zanchief wrote:You do know high fructose syrup is the same as regular sugar?
Thankfully we have "throwback" pepsi and mountain dew that is made with "real" sugar. Sugar is bad, and sugary drinks are bad. Doesn't matter if they extracted the sugar from beats, corn or anything else. It's all the same.
leah wrote:actually that's another thing that always bugged me about the atkins diet: how can something so fundamentally healthy as FRUIT be outlawed by a diet?! very perplexing.
Tikker wrote:Atkins is stupid
You shed a bunch of water weight initially but it's not sustainable
Realistically it's caloric intake Vs your metabolism.
Anything else is semantics
Tikker wrote:Atkins is stupid
You shed a bunch of water weight initially but it's not sustainable
Realistically it's caloric intake Vs your metabolism.
Anything else is semantics
leah wrote:well i know that that's the reasoning behind it--remember, atkins alum here--but i just can't get behind it. it's healthy, unprocessed sugar, you know? i just don't see how it can be that big a deal in moderation. /shrug
Zanchief wrote:Tikker wrote:Atkins is stupid
You shed a bunch of water weight initially but it's not sustainable
Realistically it's caloric intake Vs your metabolism.
Anything else is semantics
Shhh you're giving away the secret to a billion dollar industry.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests