Mark Cuban - Blogmaverick.com wrote:Team USA - The Answer
Posted Aug 18, 2004, 10:33 AM ET
This guy nailed it. When he is right, he is right. A tweak here and there, and we probably can apply the same principles to our teams over here — in multiple sports.
Comments Canadians have gone through much of this “international game is different, we have the best players but don’t win, etc.” business over the last decade or so in hockey. The parallels in many ways are eerie, and well worth looking into. The influx of Europeans into the NHL draft was a huge issue in the late 90s, for instance.
But strangely, after some huge disappointments (e.g. the men’s team not winning in the Nagano Olympics) the country radically changed the way it handles international competitions. And I do mean radically.
First, they appointed a “general manager” responsible for personal selection for each international team. They do this for the annual tournaments like the World Junior’s and for the multi-year ones like the World Cup and the Olympics. This GM basically acts like the GM of a major franchise. He scouts for player selection, both on Canada’s team and to identify the strengths/weaknesses of other country’s teams. He selects the coaching staff. He is in charge of the whole process.
In Salt Lake City, after Canada tied a (much) inferior team, he gave a (now-famous) rant to the media about how the refereeing was biased against his team and how everybody in the world wanted the team to fail. The talk worked: the team didn’t have even a marginally close game the rest of the way. He took *responsibility* for the whole process.
Second, the country as a whole — politicians, editorialists, and average fans — made it clear that losing wasn’t acceptable. Sure, international rules are different — the size of the rink is completely different! So what? We expect our teams to return with a gold medal each and every year in each and every tournament. Always.
Third, a wide array of developmental programs at the youth level were changed to help address the skill-deficiencies that had become evident at the international level. In hockey it was primarily skating and passing that had been under-emphasized for greater defensive and physical play. The bigger ice-surfaces in international hockey made this far more apparent. So now young players (e.g. age 6 and up) here get lots more training on those issues.
Fourth, being a member of the team was treated and regarded as a *privilege*, not a right. At any one time there may be three or four players in the NHL who would be assured of an invitation: the Shaq, KG, TD, and Kobe of the NHL, basically. The rest of the team? They go to a *TRY-OUT CAMP*. That’s right. Professional players get together with the coaches and go through drills and practices for a few days to get to know each other and for the coaches to see how they would fit together. There have been players who played themselves into positions on a team during these camps, and players who played themselves out of positions here too. This works because team membership is treated as a privilege.
Fifth, and finally, there was a concerted effort to decide on a style of play — from the GM down to the coaching staff — and to choose players that would fit that style. Recently one of Canada’s defensemen for the upcoming World Cup of Hockey withdrew. The coaches selected a youngish player who had attended the try-out camp. In explaining why they selected this guy, they explicitly described how his game was suited to both the style they wanted to play and to the structure and flow of the international game.
One final example of this approach at work: in Nagano, the Czech Republic had the single best player in the world on their team (Jagr). He was dominating the NHL, and was a threat to score just about every time he stepped on the ice. Team Canada knew that the Czechs were probably semi-final match-ups, so they took a defensive specialist with them. For that one game, he matched up with Jagr and held the guy scoreless the entire game. That’s like taking a Bowen or Artest on your team so that you can handle Arroyo or whoever else happens to get hot.
Mark Cuban's answer to US Basketball
Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training
Mark Cuban's answer to US Basketball
Wise man.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
People should just back off... this is Zanchief and my domain. When you CA fuckwads come here and diss on Duncan or whatever else you don't know about... GO DIE.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
GET OUT OF MY ONLY SANCTUARY ON NT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BASKETBALL IS MY ELITE CLUB OF ELITE ELITISTS!!!
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
-
Zanchief
-
bah n/m..
bah n/m..
Last edited by Ouchyfish on Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:53 am, edited 4 times in total.
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.
Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
-
Zanchief
-
Zanchief
Zanchief wrote:Can you dunk? Can knock down a 20ft fade away with a 6'7 guy on your back.
Didn't think so.
Oh now theres a skill you can't find on any fucking playground in the world.
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.
Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
Zanchief wrote:Can you dunk? Can knock down a 20ft fade away with a 6'7 guy on your back.
Didn't think so.
I can...on a 5 ft. rim. C'mon Zan...you know as well as I do, most players do not play "D", so ya...I can make a 20ft fadeaway with a 6'8 guy on my back :D
I love baseball and basketball. They are both respectable sports.
-
Zanchief
Nope, I've been on many.
Baseball is a hobby like darts and lawn bowling. It requires zero athletic ability or exertion.
The average baseball player is too fat to last 5 minutes on a basketball court. But they are revered as gods because it's the American pastime. Fat out of shape moron throwing a ball around. That's American alright.
Baseball is a hobby like darts and lawn bowling. It requires zero athletic ability or exertion.
The average baseball player is too fat to last 5 minutes on a basketball court. But they are revered as gods because it's the American pastime. Fat out of shape moron throwing a ball around. That's American alright.
So being able to dunk a basketball and shoot a fadeaway makes someone ungodly athletic, the likes of which ancient Geece would drool? Give me a fucking break. Basketball is about as simple and mind numbing as NASCAR. Do you get off on watching cars drive around in a circle too? I bet the drive-thru at the local McDonalds gives ya wood.
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.
Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
Zanchief wrote:Nope, I've been on many.
Baseball is a hobby like darts and lawn bowling. It requires zero athletic ability or exertion.
The average baseball player is too fat to last 5 minutes on a basketball court. But they are revered as gods because it's the American pastime. Fat out of shape moron throwing a ball around. That's American alright.
I do agree that basketball is more "athletic" than baseball, but saying that it requires zero atheltic ability is wrong. Also true that there are some fat baseball players , but let us not forgot Tractor Traylor, O-Miller, etc. :D
Even though baseball is regarded as the American pastime, it is not nearly as popular as football or basketball. Who do you think is more popular in the US? Shaq or Bonds?