Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Atalya wrote:are you stupid? He's been found not guilty. The chick was after money from the get go. Who goes and fucks her boyfriend AFTER getting raped and before going the hospital? Like she would have been way too tramautized to just go and fuck her bf on the way. This is just all her past coming out and everyone finding out how much of a fucking farce it is. There's no way a guy like kobe would have to rape her i guarantee he just says Hi and her pants are already around her ankles.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Tossica wrote:He all but came out and said "sorry for raping you". He is going to be fucked in civil court. She will end up with millions.
I think the important part we should all take away from this isLyion wrote:Tossica wrote:He all but came out and said "sorry for raping you". He is going to be fucked in civil court. She will end up with millions.
I think he raped her, but I think it was a type of date rape..
It'll never reach Civil court if his legal team has any brains.
It'll probably be over by the end of this week, with her getting around a Mil, and disappearing
Being Kobe just signed a 120 Mil contract, I won't cry for him...
Narrock wrote:I don't like rabbits. They remind me of this chick I met on teh internet like 5 years ago.
Lyion wrote:I think he raped her, but I think it was a type of date rape..
"She (the victim) assigned him (Bryant) that isolated room, she snuck away from her job to go meet with him, she engaged in expansive flirtation, she went in, showed him her intimate tattoos, engaged in intimate kissing and hugging, and when he took it further and she protested, he stopped.
"Add what we learned since about Mr. X and his DNA," Silverman said, referring to the DNA of another man found on the victim's underwear, "and you have an acquittal."
"There was a rush to arrest him (Bryant), vilify the guy, then sit back and gripe when all the facts turned out against them. The woman was not asked the tough questions. They (the prosecution) didn't want to test the scientific evidence - why? because they wouldn't like the results.
The woman filed the civil case in Denver federal court this month, seeking at least $75,000 in damages from Bryant.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Atalya wrote:yeah no shit. I mean i'm not a female or a rape specialist but i can't see someone wanting to go have more sex after being raped.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
To win the case, the woman's attorneys would have to prove by a "preponderance of the evidence" that Bryant forced himself on the woman and caused physical and emotional injury. That is, they would have to show that it was more likely than not that he committed the offense.
In a criminal case, prosecutors would have had to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, a more difficult standard.
Damages for pain and suffering and other non-economic losses in Colorado civil cases generally cannot exceed $733,000, though damages for economic losses and physical impairment or disfigurement are not capped. Punitive damages cannot exceed the compensatory award and can be given only if the allegations are proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
The woman's attorneys, John Clune and Lin Wood, said Wednesday no payment was made to their client and no settlement negotiations have taken place. They were in a meeting Thursday and did not return calls.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests