best/favourite group makeup, and why

More drama than an episode of Buffy

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: best/favourite group makeup, and why

Post by Tikker »

xaoshaen wrote:
Tikker wrote:I tend to like melee heavy groups over casters, and dps above CC

I'd rather ghetto ae something than worry about controlling mobs


I found this somewhat odd. If you prefer AE to mob control why not just use mages and get the job done right? A properly dressed mage can pump out solid DPS on single targets and give you the best DPS in the game against multiples.


It's probably becuase i've only run into horrible mages to date
I see a lot of power in the class, but most of the ones i've seen are retards that can only play 1 way

they can only AE
or they can only nuke
or they can only poly


the more I think about it, I tend to just prefer people who play well, regardless of class, as opposed to perfect group makeup with poor players

unlike EQ (to a certain extent) you can get by with almost any 5 classes in a group and be successful if you play to your strengths
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Post by Lyion »

My usual group is as follows

1 Mage

I would love to compare different types of groups, but you see my set nightly WOW group consists of.... me.

Until then my favorite group will continue to consist of one mage.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
10sun
NT Drunkard
NT Drunkard
Posts: 9861
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Westwood, California
Contact:

Post by 10sun »

Lyion wrote:My usual group is as follows

1 Mage

I would love to compare different types of groups, but you see my set nightly WOW group consists of.... me.

Until then my favorite group will continue to consist of one mage.


But you realized last night that even an overly inebriated me results in ownage. I still don't remember logging off after SM.

-Adam
xaoshaen
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1378
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:00 am

Re: best/favourite group makeup, and why

Post by xaoshaen »

Tikker wrote:It's probably becuase i've only run into horrible mages to date
I see a lot of power in the class, but most of the ones i've seen are retards that can only play 1 way

they can only AE
or they can only nuke
or they can only poly

the more I think about it, I tend to just prefer people who play well, regardless of class, as opposed to perfect group makeup with poor players

unlike EQ (to a certain extent) you can get by with almost any 5 classes in a group and be successful if you play to your strengths


Ahhh, the everpresent idiot factor. My friends list is populated more by people I won't group with than by people I associate with. The name test is in full effect at all times (particularly for taurens whose name is any sort of play on bovinity). I rarely wind up grouped with mages other than Melgoth (Glic), so I don't have to worry too much about them... you want to swap stupid fucking hunter stories, I've got a few though. I'm sure it's due largely to the overwhelming popularity of the class, especially since the Horde doesn't have night elf bimbos or fuckingannoyadins to draw off the skim of the crop, but it seems like a ridiculous portion of the hunters I group with are absolutely inept. Right behind them are the shamans. Ever hear "oh, I don't heal, I'm a melee shaman"? Grats you on being a groupless shaman.
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

"oh, I don't heal, I'm a melee shaman"?


WTF is that shit?
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Post by Tikker »

there are a ton of clueless players out

more than I've ever seen in any other game, except maybe early in UO

but back then, EVERYONE was clueless, so it wasn't a big deal
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

I just met another shaman that said, and I shit you not: "How do you put down more than 1 totem?!?!"

He's 35...
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
VisionZ1
NT Bixie
NT Bixie
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:01 am

Post by VisionZ1 »

Personally, I think no group is ideal but one that seems to work really well is

Warrior
Priest
hunter/sham/rouge combo -hunter assist on a rogue can drop anything very quickly
Mage/Lock (Banish, Sheep, and fear are almost essential, as well as soulstones)

druids are nice for backup rez and healing as well as mid-fight rezzing and sleep
Atalya
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Contact:

Post by Atalya »

i like our group that me and my buddies get most nights
Warrior (Full defensive spec so 6k+ defense with good agro/icy chill proc)
Priest (full holy spec + like 60 in healing focus)
Mage <-- me ( 31 Fire / 20 Arcane AE/Mana Regen Spec)
Warlock (Full hp,Hellfire, etc spec)
Shaman/Druid (Both full healing spec)

We can roll through Strath, LBRS, Scholo np with our AE power and one healer each spamming myself and the warlock. I've hit 16,800 DPS in Stratholme np.
User avatar
chanteez
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:39 am
Location: abbotsford, b.c.

Post by chanteez »

our usual group for brd is

warrior
warrior
hunter
priest
druid/myself

my ideal for ae places
same but mage instead of hunter

of course 1 warrior can be substituted for rogue or pally
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

not with pally because only noobs play alliance
User avatar
chanteez
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:39 am
Location: abbotsford, b.c.

Post by chanteez »

i've played both, and both are equally easy
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

:liar:
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
chanteez
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:39 am
Location: abbotsford, b.c.

lol

Post by chanteez »

basically.... i can level up to 28 just as quick in alliance vrs horde zones... i have done both np... level 28 both share sv zones (where i go in alliance) then after that tanaris which is shared by both, then ungaro's which is shared by both, etc etc... basically after 28 most zones are quested by both horde and alliance, which i exp in.

i dont play humans myself, so i'm comparing night elf/gnome with my undead/tauren experience.
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

OH WOW LEVEL 28 WHOA

k whatever noob
User avatar
Tae-Bo
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 3636
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:38 pm

Post by Tae-Bo »

alliance newbie zones suck i dunno what you guys are talking about

i'd rather shoot myself in the head than to deal with that shit anymore
Chances are very good that you've never touched Linux a day in your pathetic life.
User avatar
chanteez
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:39 am
Location: abbotsford, b.c.

Post by chanteez »

readboss ... i said up to level 28 is easy in both

after that both factions share the main area's just the same, so one cant be said to be easier than other.

i've played to 40 in horde as priest.. undead in beta
and 60 in alliance

far from newb... been playing since nov 2003
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

WOW GOOD JOB NOOB!
User avatar
WoWShaman
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:41 pm

Post by WoWShaman »

Im a shaman, But I dont fucking heal, Unless its a very close knit group I would rather laugh at you as you die then heal you.
That's my outlook on life. and Im so far very successful with getting a group.
I more so drop totems to help crowd control, help boost dps to the overall group, maximize mana return, and do small amounts of ae damage then heal.

If you want to bitch because you think the Shaman class is to heal only then go fuck yourself. Its versitile and more complex then being the bitch boy who backup heals.

Maybe if your group shaman only heals he is selling himself short. Who knows, who cares. I have more useful abilities then to stand around hit F1-f5 and press the X key over and over.

Anyway im done.
Peace
:vonk:
To all my freaks out there,
Holla if you hear me !
Big Bad Booty Shaman in the house!
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

Being backup healer doesn't mean you're healing every 2 seconds. If you're invited into groups in high level instances as a backup healer and you don't heal during the fight, you will never win.
xaoshaen
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1378
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:00 am

Post by xaoshaen »

WoWShaman wrote:Im a shaman, But I dont fucking heal, Unless its a very close knit group I would rather laugh at you as you die then heal you.
That's my outlook on life. and Im so far very successful with getting a group.
I more so drop totems to help crowd control, help boost dps to the overall group, maximize mana return, and do small amounts of ae damage then heal.

If you want to bitch because you think the Shaman class is to heal only then go fuck yourself. Its versitile and more complex then being the bitch boy who backup heals.

Maybe if your group shaman only heals he is selling himself short. Who knows, who cares. I have more useful abilities then to stand around hit F1-f5 and press the X key over and over.


Nobody said a shaman should only heal. But a shaman who does not heal is generally wasted space in a group. Everything else they bring to a group is done significantly better by other classes. The value of shaman lies in the combination of their abilities: if they ignore a subset of their functionality, their overall performance suffers significantly.
Atalya
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Contact:

Post by Atalya »

WoWShaman wrote:Im a shaman, But I dont fucking heal, Unless its a very close knit group I would rather laugh at you as you die then heal you.
That's my outlook on life. and Im so far very successful with getting a group.
I more so drop totems to help crowd control, help boost dps to the overall group, maximize mana return, and do small amounts of ae damage then heal.

If you want to bitch because you think the Shaman class is to heal only then go fuck yourself. Its versitile and more complex then being the bitch boy who backup heals.

Maybe if your group shaman only heals he is selling himself short. Who knows, who cares. I have more useful abilities then to stand around hit F1-f5 and press the X key over and over.

Anyway im done.
Peace
:vonk:


So you're saying you're a useless tard then. IF you're one of the shamans that ONLY melee and nuke then please just delete now because you're a waste of a group space and a waste of a queue slot. Shamans are mediocre dps, zero crowd control, buffs that usually only help other mediocre dps classes (warriors, hunters, and themselves) the only redeeming quality for me to ever have a shaman in a group was the fact they "can" heal when need be. Any group that relies on a shaman for dps is just going to either crawl at a 8 hour instance pace or just die np.

And any group with 2 warriors and a hunter is just meh to me as well... Hunters and warriors are subpar dps classes and what's the point of having 2 warriors if you have a druid sometimes as well when a druid gains agro with growl faster then a 2nd warrior ever would.
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Post by Tikker »

well, some people actually play just to have fun, and hang with friends =P

That being said, While i normally like to specialize, rogue, mage, or priest, i ended up choosing to play a hunter just because i could be relatively effective playing with just 1 hand (other holding the baby)
User avatar
Zanathar
NT Disciple
NT Disciple
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:10 am
Location: In the shadow of the Moon.

Post by Zanathar »

Tikker wrote: i could be relatively effective playing with just 1 hand (other holding the baby)


Is that what you call yours?

Sicko
Zanathar
The Nuking Skeleton
WoW
I helped :ban: Mindia!!!! Too bad he is back...
User avatar
Jirig
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 4:47 am
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Re: best/favourite group makeup, and why

Post by Jirig »

Tikker wrote:
xaoshaen wrote:
Tikker wrote:I tend to like melee heavy groups over casters, and dps above CC

I'd rather ghetto ae something than worry about controlling mobs


I found this somewhat odd. If you prefer AE to mob control why not just use mages and get the job done right? A properly dressed mage can pump out solid DPS on single targets and give you the best DPS in the game against multiples.


It's probably becuase i've only run into horrible mages to date
I see a lot of power in the class, but most of the ones i've seen are retards that can only play 1 way

they can only AE
or they can only nuke
or they can only poly


the more I think about it, I tend to just prefer people who play well, regardless of class, as opposed to perfect group makeup with poor players

unlike EQ (to a certain extent) you can get by with almost any 5 classes in a group and be successful if you play to your strengths


You need to fire whoever your mage is, then. (Pun intended~)

I have absolutely no problem keeping something sheeped while nuking. Blizzard and flamestrike are a different story... but I can easily cast arcane explosion, frost nova, and cone of cold around my sheep with little to no worry.
Post Reply