NYC, look whats next on the banning block
Moderator: Dictators in Training
NYC, look whats next on the banning block
All I can say is WOW, what will be next
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15020846/
[quote]Doughnuts in danger? NYC may ban trans fats
Health officials unveil proposal to bar substance in restaurants
NEW YORK - Three years after the city banned smoking in restaurants, health officials are talking about prohibiting something they say is almost as bad: artificial trans fatty acids.
The city health department unveiled a proposal Tuesday that would bar cooks at any of the city’s 24,600 food service establishments from using ingredients that contain the artery-clogging substance, commonly listed on food labels as partially hydrogenated oil.
Artificial trans fats are found in some shortenings, margarine and frying oils and turn up in foods from pie crusts to french fries to doughnuts.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement
Doctors agree that trans fats are unhealthy in nearly any amount, but a spokesman for the restaurant industry said he was stunned the city would seek to ban a legal ingredient found in millions of American kitchens.
“Labeling is one thing, but when they totally ban a product, it goes well beyond what we think is prudent and acceptable,â€
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15020846/
[quote]Doughnuts in danger? NYC may ban trans fats
Health officials unveil proposal to bar substance in restaurants
NEW YORK - Three years after the city banned smoking in restaurants, health officials are talking about prohibiting something they say is almost as bad: artificial trans fatty acids.
The city health department unveiled a proposal Tuesday that would bar cooks at any of the city’s 24,600 food service establishments from using ingredients that contain the artery-clogging substance, commonly listed on food labels as partially hydrogenated oil.
Artificial trans fats are found in some shortenings, margarine and frying oils and turn up in foods from pie crusts to french fries to doughnuts.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement
Doctors agree that trans fats are unhealthy in nearly any amount, but a spokesman for the restaurant industry said he was stunned the city would seek to ban a legal ingredient found in millions of American kitchens.
“Labeling is one thing, but when they totally ban a product, it goes well beyond what we think is prudent and acceptable,â€
Last edited by Gidan on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
Re: NYC, look whats next on the banning block
Gidan wrote:All I can say is WOW, what will be next
Your privacy, o wait . . .
Oh, Crisco would be legal. It's not a modified vegetable oil.
It just has tons of cholesterol, which is why it's bad for you.
The culprits they're mainly talking about are vegetable oils that have been modified by saturating them, so that they're more solid at room temperature. Margerine, etc. Been known for a while now that margerine is way worse for you than butter, for that very reason.
That said, I think the ban is bullshit. People are adults, if they want to eat self-destructively, then they have every right to. Smoking is different, in that the smoke impacts everyone in a wide area around you. Short of passing gas, eating a doughnut doesn't exactly impact anyone else.
-Arlos
It just has tons of cholesterol, which is why it's bad for you.
The culprits they're mainly talking about are vegetable oils that have been modified by saturating them, so that they're more solid at room temperature. Margerine, etc. Been known for a while now that margerine is way worse for you than butter, for that very reason.
That said, I think the ban is bullshit. People are adults, if they want to eat self-destructively, then they have every right to. Smoking is different, in that the smoke impacts everyone in a wide area around you. Short of passing gas, eating a doughnut doesn't exactly impact anyone else.
-Arlos
arlos wrote: Short of passing gas, eating a doughnut doesn't exactly impact anyone else.
-Arlos
DA mode on
You know that isn't exactly true. Who will pay for that donut eating fat guy when he is in the hospital? Hmm, I think that could very likely be you and I if you follow.
This brings up a hijack of sorts, a debate I got in with my bro. I'll post in another thread to not hijack this one.
Ginzburgh wrote:Who will pay for that donut eating fat guy when he is in the hospital?
And you would be assuming that everyone who eats donuts are ouverweight. What about those who have some self control and treat themselves to the occasional donut and are not overweight at all?
I'm not assuming this, and you are correct, not all folks that eat donuts are overweight.
The law is being imposed / proposed for a reason however and this reason is for folks that lack the ability you have, i.e. self control. So my point does stand as valid.
See the problem is this, if folks don't take care of themselves, and this lack of care causes detrimental impact to the society as a whole, and even worse, those that lack this care are also the majority of the populace, other then law, what option does society have?
For those that would say, forget them, let them die of heart failure, bla bla bla, our society won't let that happen. We'd sooner increase taxes to pay for the fat guy's medical bills.
For the record I think it is BS, hence my DA mode on statement (devils advocate =DA)
Some yahoo got the idea from somewhere, it isn't like the Dr. woke up one morning and said hey, lets actually try to get a law to ban trans-fats. A study was done and all that neat stuff that researchers and Dr.s do.
But I'll degress as we could debate this forever and a day.
DA off LOL
Personal Opinion - the suggestion in of itself is absurd when many other things cause equal / more harm.
But I'll degress as we could debate this forever and a day.
DA off LOL
Personal Opinion - the suggestion in of itself is absurd when many other things cause equal / more harm.
Zanchief wrote:This story makes me think of Firefly for some reason.
Hmm I was thinking more along the lines of Taco Bell winning the restaruant chain wars as being the next news story, and that it may be time to give more serious thought into how the three sea shells work.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Lueyen wrote:Zanchief wrote:This story makes me think of Firefly for some reason.
Hmm I was thinking more along the lines of Taco Bell winning the restaruant chain wars as being the next news story, and that it may be time to give more serious thought into how the three sea shells work.
Yea I was actually thinking of Dennis Leary's rant in that film also.
What a world we live in where Judge Dredd is prophetic.
- Gargamellow
- Nappy Headed Ho

- Posts: 8683
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:39 am
- Location: Nunyafuggin Bidness
- Contact:
Gargamellow wrote:ok that is going too far
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/factsheets/HealthEffectsofCigaretteSmoking_Factsheet.htm
http://quitsmoking.about.com/cs/nicotineinhaler/a/cigingredients.htm
http://www.ash.org/papers/h1.htm
try this too. Pick up a used ashtray and take a whiff. thats what you smell like after smoking. Perfumes etc don't cover it up.
add to that the risks 2nd hand smoke poses to children and other non-smokers. Plus what it does to your looks....
For you


- Gargamellow
- Nappy Headed Ho

- Posts: 8683
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:39 am
- Location: Nunyafuggin Bidness
- Contact:









