Most criminals are atheists, or, conversely, most atheists (ie all of them!) are criminals (they just haven’t all been caught yet).
proof that mindia wrote this article, or maybe lyion
One of the most annoying things about Atheists is that their mad lack of belief actually makes them feel somehow superior to real American Christians. Rejecting decent honest faith and belief they use things like a reliance on “scientific methodology”, “reasoned argument”, “historical evidence”, “documentary proof” and “logic” to baffle and confuse. Instead of accepting the obvious reality that the Bible is God’s word, they try to claim that the Gospels were written hundreds of years after the death of Jesus, that there were hundreds of other similar books rejected by committee at something called the council of Nicea and that most of the New Testament was compiled out of political expediency. They say that many of the Jesus stories existed long before Jesus was said to have been alive and that most of his sayings and parables aren’t that impressive anyway. They are wrong.
If you're going to entitle your article 'The truth about Atheism exposed', you shouldn't contradict yourself right off the bat in the first paragraph -- it's hard to actively hate something if you don't believe it exists.
Though in the second paragraph, the author seems quite proud to announce that hate itself is alive and well.
I skimmed the rest since it's pretty much totally apocryphal and aggrandized hyperbole.
I think modern christians just like to feel like victims. They run everything allready and still complain. I thought most criminals were black and just bout all of them beleive in the jesus. This is the shit thatmakes me hate those people.
WHITE TRASH METAL SLUMMER Why Immortal technique? Perhaps its because I am afraid and he gives me courage.
arlos wrote:The author of that no doubt attends the Landover Baptist Church, and has The Onion as their primary news source.
-Arlos
It's almost as if... he is trying to show how funny it is that people follow this shit. Or even better, to show how people who dont follow this shit take opinions such as those seriously.
I knew (prior to posting) that Landover is a parody of Xtian extremism. Since I hadn't heard of Landover before, I wiki'd it. So in referring to Landover, I was being deliberately facetious. Or not, depending on whether one considers discussion of parody "serious" discussion.
But the Onion is actually funny sometimes.
The ShellytheRepublican site wasn't funny to me. At all.
So therein lies my difficulty. I'm not sure why I would find one funny and the other not, since they're employing similar comedic devices and styles.
